Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A prospective randomized trial on azathioprine addition to cyclosporine versus cyclosporine monotherapy at steroid withdrawal, 6 months after renal transplantation.
Sandrini, S; Maiorca, R; Scolari, F; Cancarini, G; Setti, G; Gaggia, P; Cristinelli, L; Zubani, R; Bonardelli, S; Maffeis, R; Portolani, N; Nodari, F; Giulini, S M.
Afiliação
  • Sandrini S; Division of Nephrology, University and Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Transplantation ; 69(9): 1861-7, 2000 May 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10830223
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Many attempts have been made to withdraw steroid therapy in renal transplant patients in order to avoid its many side effects. Results have been, so far, controversial. In this randomized prospective study, we compare the efficacy of azathioprine adjuncts to cyclosporine at the time of steroid withdrawal, 6 months after transplantation, versus Cyclosporine monotherapy, in preventing acute rejection.

METHODS:

One hundred and sixteen kidney transplant patients with good and stable renal function (creatininemia <2 mg/dl) received, in the first 6 months, cyclosporine + steroid. They were then randomized into two groups (A and B), and steroid therapy was withdrawn over 2 months. Group A (58 patients) continued on cyclosporine monotherapy, whereas group B (58 patients) added azathioprine (1 mg/kg/day) at the beginning of randomization and continued on cyclosporine + azathioprine. In both groups, patients resumed steroid therapy at the first episode of acute rejection. Follow-up after randomization was 5.3+/-1.6 years.

RESULTS:

After 5 years, the incidence of steroid resumption was 57% in group A and 29% in group B (P<0.02); of those, 68% and 88% of them were within 6 months from randomization. Anti-rejection therapy was always successful. Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 90% and 88% in group A and 100% and 91% in group B. Creatininemia did not differ, at follow-up. Side effects differed only for mild and reversible leukopenia caused by azathioprine in group B.

CONCLUSION:

Cyclosporine plus azathioprine is more effective than cyclosporine monotherapy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection after steroid withdrawal. Graft loss as a result of chronic rejection, mild in both groups, did not differ. Steroid withdrawal is feasible and advantageous, and the addition of azathioprine allowed 71% of our selected patients to remain steroid-free.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Azatioprina / Transplante de Rim / Ciclosporina / Corticosteroides / Rejeição de Enxerto / Imunossupressores Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplantation Ano de publicação: 2000 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Azatioprina / Transplante de Rim / Ciclosporina / Corticosteroides / Rejeição de Enxerto / Imunossupressores Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplantation Ano de publicação: 2000 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália