Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Transurethral enucleation of the prostate with the holmium: YAG laser system: how much power is necessary?]. / Transurethrale Laserenukleation der Prostata mit dem Holmiumlaser : Wie viel Leistung ist notwendig?
Rassweiler, J; Roder, M; Schulze, M; Muschter, R.
Afiliação
  • Rassweiler J; Urologische Klinik, Klinkum Heilbronn, Am Gesundbrunnen 20, 74074 Heilbronn, Deutschland. jens.rassweiler@slk-kliniken.de
Urologe A ; 47(4): 441-8, 2008 Apr.
Article em De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18338152
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intermediate power (50 W) holmiumYAG laser system for transurethral enucleation of the prostate (TULP) with the use of a new mechanical morcellator. Our results are compared with the results of high-powered holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) presented in the literature. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

From December 2003 to January 2008, 129 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were treated by TULP. In 45 cases (group A; 2.0, 12 Hz) we used a bipolar resectoscope (VISTA/ACMI) for morcellation, whereas after that morcellation was accomplished with a modified endoscopic shaver (Wolf). Thirty-nine patients were treated using 25 W (group B; 2.0 J, 12 Hz), and 45 patients were treated using 40 W (group C; 2.2 J 18 Hz), who were compared with 45 matched-pair patients who received transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP; group D). Finally, the literature on HoLEP was reviewed.

RESULTS:

Bipolar morcellation significantly prolonged the operating time (135 vs. 131 vs. 96 min). The morcellation speed averaged 2.8 (range 1.3-5.2) g/min with no complications. The resection speed (retrieval rate) of 40-W TULP was comparable to that for TURP (0.71 vs. 0.76 g/min). The transfusion rate was lower than for TURP (8% vs. 12%), with a smaller Hb difference (3.1 vs. 3.8 mg/dl). Catheter times (3.4 vs. 4.1 days) were similar; however, hospital stay was significantly shorter after TULP (5.2 vs. 6.8 days). The complication rate was significantly lower (6.6% vs. 13.3%). The efficacy of HoLEP significantly improved with introduction of the morcellator Resection speed increased from 0.34-0.61 g/min to 0.48-0.82 g/min. HoLEP was better than 40-W TULP regarding transfusion rate (0-4% vs. 8%) and catheter time (1.1-1.5 vs. 3.4 days). Complications and functional results were similar. CONCLUSION[UBERSCHRIFT] The intermediate-power 50-W holmium laser together with the new morcellator enable safe transurethral enucleation of the prostate. As with HoLEP, the procedure has a significant learning curve. The retrieval times of TULP are similar to those for HoLEP, but the risk of bleeding is higher. New modifications (i.e., thullium laser) will further improve the technique of laser enucleation.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata / Terapia a Laser / Lasers de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: De Revista: Urologe A Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata / Terapia a Laser / Lasers de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: De Revista: Urologe A Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article