Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A North American multilaboratory study of CD4 counts using flow cytometric panLeukogating (PLG): a NIAID-DAIDS Immunology Quality Assessment Program Study.
Denny, Thomas N; Gelman, Rebecca; Bergeron, Michele; Landay, Alan; Lam, Lee; Louzao, Raul; Mandy, Frank F; Schmitz, John; Spira, Thomas; Wilkening, Cindy; Glencross, Deborah K.
Afiliação
  • Denny TN; Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA. thomas.denny@duke.edu
Cytometry B Clin Cytom ; 74 Suppl 1: S52-64, 2008.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18351622
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The global HIV/AIDS pandemic and guidelines for initiating anti-retroviral therapy (ART) and opportunistic infection prophylaxis demand affordable, reliable, and accurate CD4 testing. A simple innovative approach applicable to existing technology that has been successfully applied in resource-challenged settings, PanLeukogated CD4 (PLG), could offer solutions for cost saving and improved precision.

METHODS:

Day-old whole blood from 99 HIV+ donors was simultaneously studied in five North-American laboratories to compare the performance of their predicate methods with the dual-platform PLG method. The predicate technology included varying 4-color CD45/CD3/CD4/CD8 protocols on different flow cytometers. Each laboratory also assayed eight replicate specimens of day-old blood from 10 to 14 local donors. Bias and precision of predicate and PLG methods was studied between- and within-participating laboratories.

RESULTS:

Significantly (P < 0.0001) improved between-laboratory precision/coefficient of variation (CV%) was noted using the PLG method (overall median 9.3% vs. predicate median CV 13.1%). Within-laboratory precision was also significantly (P < 0.0001) better overall using PLG (median 4.6% vs. predicate median CV 6.2%) and in 3 of the 5 laboratories. PLG counts tended to be 11% smaller than predicate methods (P < 0.0001) for shipped (median of predicate-PLG = 31) and local specimens (median of predicate-PLG = 23), both overall and in 4 of 5 laboratories (median decreases of 4, 16, 20, and 21% in shipped specimens); the other laboratory had a median increase of 5%.

CONCLUSION:

Laboratories using predicate CD4 methods similar to those in this study could improve their between-laboratory and their within-laboratory precision, and reduce costs, by switching to the PLG method after adequate training, if a change (usually, a decrease) in CD4 counts is acceptable to their health systems.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde / Contagem de Linfócito CD4 / Citometria de Fluxo / Laboratórios Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Cytometry B Clin Cytom Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde / Contagem de Linfócito CD4 / Citometria de Fluxo / Laboratórios Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Cytometry B Clin Cytom Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos