Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of tigecycline compared with vancomycin or linezolid for treatment of serious infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a Phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study.
Florescu, I; Beuran, M; Dimov, R; Razbadauskas, A; Bochan, M; Fichev, G; Dukart, G; Babinchak, T; Cooper, C A; Ellis-Grosse, E J; Dartois, N; Gandjini, H.
Afiliação
  • Florescu I; Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 62 Suppl 1: i17-28, 2008 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18684703
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are causing serious nosocomial infections. Tigecycline was evaluated in hospitalized patients with MRSA or VRE infection. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

A randomized (31), double-blind, multicentre, Phase 3 study compared the safety and efficacy of tigecycline with vancomycin or linezolid in hospitalized patients with MRSA or VRE infection, respectively. Patients were treated for 7-28 days and the test-of-cure (TOC) assessment was made 12-37 days after the last dose. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response (cure, failure and indeterminate) in the co-primary, microbiologically evaluable (ME) and microbiologically modified intent-to-treat (m-mITT) populations at the TOC assessment.

RESULTS:

For MRSA infection, clinical cure rates in the ME population (n = 117) were 81.4% (70 of 86 patients) with tigecycline and 83.9% (26 of 31 patients) with vancomycin. In the m-mITT population (n = 133), clinical cure occurred in 75 of 100 tigecycline-treated patients (75.0%) and in 27 of 33 vancomycin-treated patients (81.8%). In patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by MRSA, cure rates were similar with tigecycline or vancomycin (86.4% versus 86.9% in ME population; and 78.6% versus 87.0% in m-mITT population). In patients with MRSA infection, nausea or vomiting occurred more frequently with tigecycline than with vancomycin (41.0% versus 17.9%); most cases were mild, with only three patients discontinuing treatment. In patients with VRE (total enrollment, 15), 3 of 3 and 3 of 8 patients in the ME and m-mITT populations, respectively, were cured by tigecycline, compared with 2 of 3 patients in the ME and m-mITT populations treated with linezolid.

CONCLUSIONS:

Tigecycline is safe and effective in hospitalized patients with serious infection caused by MRSA. There were too few cases of VRE to draw any conclusions.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Staphylococcus aureus / Resistência a Meticilina / Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas / Enterococcus / Resistência a Vancomicina / Minociclina / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Antimicrob Chemother Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Romênia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Staphylococcus aureus / Resistência a Meticilina / Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas / Enterococcus / Resistência a Vancomicina / Minociclina / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Antimicrob Chemother Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Romênia