Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Component-resolved diagnosis from latex allergy by microarray.
Ebo, D G; Hagendorens, M M; De Knop, K J; Verweij, M M; Bridts, C H; De Clerck, L S; Stevens, W J.
Afiliação
  • Ebo DG; Department of Immunology - Allergology - Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 40(2): 348-58, 2010 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20210809
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A positive specific IgE (sIgE) result for latex does not always mirror the clinical situation and is frequently found in individuals without overt latex allergy.

OBJECTIVE:

We sought to investigate the potential of component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) of latex allergy by microarray and to assess whether the technique allows discriminating genuine allergy from asymptomatic sensitization.

METHODS:

Twenty-six healthy controls without a history of latex allergy with a negative latex sIgE and skin test, 22 latex-allergic patients with a compelling history of latex allergy with a positive latex sIgE and prick test and 20 latex-sensitized individuals with a frequent asymptomatic exposure to natural rubber latex-containing devices with a negative latex skin test but a positive sIgE were also included. CRD was performed with the ImmunoCAP ISAC microarray and traditional singleplexed ImmunoCAP.

RESULTS:

In all patients, the diagnosis of latex allergy could be established by the combination of recombinant latex components present on the microarray (Hev b 1, Hev b 3, Hev b 5 and Hev b 6.02). Over three-quarters of our patients were sensitized for Hev b 5 and/or Hev b 6.02. Some patients also displayed reactivity for Hev b 1 and/or Hev b 3. In contrast, none of the individuals sensitized to natural rubber latex or control individuals demonstrated IgE reactivity for rHev b 1, rHev b 3, rHev b 5 or rHev b 6.02. Three-quarters of the patients sensitized to latex displayed a positive microarray result for recombinant latex profilin (rHev b 8). In contrast to the results obtained by traditional ImmunoCAP for bromelain, almost no sensitization for cross-reactive carbohydrates was demonstrated by bromelain spotted on the microarray. CRD by traditional singleplexed ImmunoCAP showed highly comparable results.

CONCLUSION:

CRD by microarray is a reliable tool for diagnosing latex allergy. In addition, the technique allows discrimination between genuine allergy and sensitization. CRD by microarray can improve the diagnosis of IgE-mediated latex allergy by discriminating between genuine allergy and sensitization. CRD by microarray is a reliable tool to diagnose latex allergy. In addition, the technique allows discrimination between a genuine allergy and simple sensitization.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipersensibilidade ao Látex / Análise Serial de Proteínas / Látex Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Exp Allergy Assunto da revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipersensibilidade ao Látex / Análise Serial de Proteínas / Látex Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Exp Allergy Assunto da revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica