Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-dose-rate brachytherapy as a monotherapy for favorable-risk prostate cancer: a Phase II trial.
Barkati, Maroie; Williams, Scott G; Foroudi, Farshad; Tai, Keen Hun; Chander, Sarat; van Dyk, Sylvia; See, Andrew; Duchesne, Gillian M.
Afiliação
  • Barkati M; Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 82(5): 1889-96, 2012 Apr 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21550182
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

There are multiple treatment options for favorable-risk prostate cancer. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a monotherapy is appealing, but its use is still investigational. A Phase II trial was undertaken to explore the value of such treatment in low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was a single-institution, prospective study. Eligible patients had low-risk prostate cancer features but also Gleason scores of 7 (51% of patients) and stage T2b to T2c cancer. Treatment with HDR brachytherapy with a single implant was administered over 2 days. One of four fractionation schedules was used in a dose escalation study

design:

3 fractions of 10, 10.5, 11, or 11.5 Gy. Patients were assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 2.0 for urinary toxicity, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring schema for rectal toxicity, and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire to measure patient-reported health-related quality of life. Biochemical failure was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir plus 2 ng/ml.

RESULTS:

Between 2003 and 2008, 79 patients were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 39.5 months, biochemical relapse occurred in 7 patients. Three- and 5-year actuarial biochemical control rates were 88.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.0-96.2%) and 85.1% (95% CI, 72.5-94.5%), respectively. Acute grade 3 urinary toxicity was seen in only 1 patient. There was no instance of acute grade 3 rectal toxicity. Rates of late grade 3 rectal toxicity, dysuria, hematuria, urinary retention, and urinary incontinence were 0%, 10.3%, 1.3%, 9.0%, and 0%, respectively. No grade 4 or greater toxicity was recorded. Among the four (urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal) domains assessed with the EPIC questionnaire, only the sexual domain did not recover with time.

CONCLUSIONS:

HDR brachytherapy as a monotherapy for favorable-risk prostate cancer, administered using a single implant over 2 days, is feasible and has acceptable acute and late toxicities. Further follow-up is still required to better evaluate the efficacy of such treatment.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Braquiterapia / Adenocarcinoma Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Braquiterapia / Adenocarcinoma Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália