Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is ileostomy always necessary following rectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis?
Akladios, Cherif; Messori, Pietro; Faller, Emilie; Puga, Marco; Afors, Karolina; Leroy, Joel; Wattiez, Arnaud.
Afiliação
  • Akladios C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; IRCAD, Strasbourg, France. Electronic address: cherif.youssef2@wanadoo.fr.
  • Messori P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; IRCAD, Strasbourg, France.
  • Faller E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; IRCAD, Strasbourg, France.
  • Puga M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; IRCAD, Strasbourg, France.
  • Afors K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; IRCAD, Strasbourg, France.
  • Leroy J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; IRCAD, Strasbourg, France.
  • Wattiez A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; IRCAD, Strasbourg, France.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 22(1): 103-9, 2015 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25109779
OBJECTIVE: To verify the hypothesis that in most patients bowel segmental resection to treat endometriosis can be safely performed without creation of a stoma and to discuss the limitations of this statement. DESIGN: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Forty-one women with sigmoid and rectal endometriotic lesions who underwent segmental resection. INTERVENTION: Segmental resection procedures performed between 2004 and 2011. Patient demographic, operative, and postoperative data were compared. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sigmoid resection was performed in 6 patients (15%), and rectal anterior resection in 35 patients (high in 21 patients [51%], and low, i.e., <10 cm from the anal verge, in 14 [34%]). In 4 patients a temporary ileostomy was created. There was 1 anastomotic leak (2.4%), in a patient with an unprotected anastomosis, which was treated via laparoscopic surgery and creation of a temporary ileostomy. Other postoperative complications included hemoperitoneum, pelvic abscess, pelvic collection, and a ureteral vaginal fistula, in 1 patient each (all 2.4%). CONCLUSION: A protective stoma may be averted in low anastomosis if it is >5 cm from the anal verge and there are no adverse intraoperative events.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Doenças Retais / Reto / Doenças do Colo Sigmoide / Ileostomia / Colectomia / Endometriose Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Minim Invasive Gynecol Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Doenças Retais / Reto / Doenças do Colo Sigmoide / Ileostomia / Colectomia / Endometriose Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Minim Invasive Gynecol Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article