Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Refined medullary blast and white blood cell count based classification of chronic myelomonocytic leukemias.
Schuler, E; Schroeder, M; Neukirchen, J; Strupp, C; Xicoy, B; Kündgen, A; Hildebrandt, B; Haas, R; Gattermann, N; Germing, U.
Afiliação
  • Schuler E; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: Esther.Zipperer@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
  • Schroeder M; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Neukirchen J; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Strupp C; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Xicoy B; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Kündgen A; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Hildebrandt B; Department of Human Genetics and Anthropology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Haas R; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Gattermann N; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Germing U; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Leuk Res ; 38(12): 1413-9, 2014 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25444076
ABSTRACT
Since 2001, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is classified by the WHO as myeloproliferative/myelodysplastic neoplasm. Herein we tried to better describe CMML patients with regard to hematological characteristics and prognosis using data of the Duesseldorf registry. We created 6 CMML subgroups, by dividing dysplastic and proliferative CMML at the cut-off of white blood cell count of 13,000/µL and splitting these two groups into 3 subgroups CMML 0 with <5% blasts (n=101), CMML I with 5-9% blasts (n=204) and CMML II with 10-19% blasts (n=81). For comparison we included patients with RCMD, RAEB I and II. The newly created CMML 0 group had better prognosis than CMML I and II, median survival times were 31 months (ms), 19ms and 13ms, respectively (p<0.001). Median survival times between the corresponding dysplastic and proliferative subgroups 0 and 1 differed significantly CMML 0 dysplastic 48ms and CMML 0 proliferative 17ms (p=0.03), CMML I dysplastic 29ms and CMML I proliferative 15ms (p=0.008), CMML II dysplastic 17ms and CMML II proliferative 10ms (p=0.09). Outcome of CMML patients worsens with increasing medullary blasts and when presenting as proliferative type. Therefore it is justified to separate CMML with <5% medullary blasts.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva / Crise Blástica / Proliferação de Células Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Leuk Res Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva / Crise Blástica / Proliferação de Células Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Leuk Res Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article