Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk stratification in early pregnancy for women at increased risk of gestational diabetes.
Harrison, C L; Lombard, C B; East, C; Boyle, J; Teede, H J.
Afiliação
  • Harrison CL; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Lombard CB; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • East C; Monash Women's Maternity Services, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Boyle J; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Teede HJ; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Diabetes and Vascular Medicine Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: Helena.teede@monash.edu.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 107(1): 61-8, 2015 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25444356
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To evaluate the addition of fasting glucose and lipids to a simple, validated risk prediction tool for gestational diabetes (GDM) applied in early pregnancy.

METHODS:

Women at risk of developing GDM on a validated risk prediction tool were recruited in early pregnancy into a large randomised controlled trial. Outcome measures included fasting biochemical markers (glucose, lipids) at 12-15 weeks gestation and GDM diagnosis (28 weeks gestation). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify additional predictive biochemical variables for GDM, with corresponding receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves generated. Unadjusted and adjusted models were derived for both the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy (ADIPS) and the International Association for Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) GDM diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS:

51 (23%) Women were diagnosed with GDM based on ADIPS criteria, with 60 (30%) diagnosed based on IADPSG criteria. In all four regression models, fasting glucose was the strongest predictor for GDM development with an odds ratio range of 4.7-6.3 (ADIPS) and 8.8-10 (IADPSG). ROC curves revealed an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.86) for ADIPS criteria and 0.83 (95% CI 0.77-0.90) for IADPSG criteria for adjusted models.

CONCLUSIONS:

In a two-step approach, when applied with a validated risk prediction tool, fasting glucose in early pregnancy was predictive of GDM and incrementally improved risk identification, presenting potential for an early pregnancy, GDM risk screening strategy for streamlining of pregnancy care and opportunity for preventive intervention.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gravidez / Diabetes Gestacional Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gravidez / Diabetes Gestacional Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália