Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Meta-analysis of radical resection rates and margin assessment in pancreatic cancer.
Chandrasegaram, M D; Goldstein, D; Simes, J; Gebski, V; Kench, J G; Gill, A J; Samra, J S; Merrett, N D; Richardson, A J; Barbour, A P.
Afiliação
  • Chandrasegaram MD; National Health and Medical Research Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Goldstein D; Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Simes J; Department of Surgery, Prince Charles Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
  • Gebski V; Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Prince of Wales Clinical School University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Kench JG; National Health and Medical Research Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Gill AJ; National Health and Medical Research Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Samra JS; Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Merrett ND; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Richardson AJ; Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Barbour AP; Department of Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
Br J Surg ; 102(12): 1459-72, 2015 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26350029
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

R0 resection rates (complete tumour removal with negative resection margins) in pancreatic cancer are 70-80 per cent when a 0-mm margin is used, declining to 15-24 per cent with a 1-mm margin. This review evaluated the R0 resection rates according to different margin definitions and techniques.

METHODS:

Three databases (MEDLINE from 1946, PubMed from 1946 and Embase from 1949) were searched to mid-October 2014. The search terms included 'pancreatectomy OR pancreaticoduodenectomy' and 'margin'. A meta-analysis was performed with studies in three groups group 1, axial slicing technique (minimum 1-mm margin); group 2, other slicing techniques (minimum 1-mm margin); and group 3, studies with minimum 0-mm margin.

RESULTS:

The R0 rates were 29 (95 per cent c.i. 26 to 32) per cent in group 1 (8 studies; 882 patients) and 49 (47 to 52) per cent in group 2 (6 studies; 1568 patients). The combined R0 rate (groups 1 and 2) was 41 (40 to 43) per cent. The R0 rate in group 3 (7 studies; 1926 patients) with a 0-mm margin was 72 (70 to 74) per cent The survival hazard ratios (R1 resection/R0 resection) revealed a reduction in the risk of death of at least 22 per cent in group 1, 12 per cent in group 2 and 23 per cent in group 3 with an R0 compared with an R1 resection. Local recurrence occurred more frequently with an R1 resection in most studies.

CONCLUSION:

Margin clearance definitions affect R0 resection rates in pancreatic cancer surgery. This review collates individual studies providing an estimate of achievable R0 rates, creating a benchmark for future trials.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pancreatectomia / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Surg Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pancreatectomia / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Surg Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália