Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physical, morphological, and wound healing properties of a polyurethane foam-film dressing.
Lee, Seung Moon; Park, Il Kyu; Kim, Yong Soo; Kim, Hyun Jung; Moon, Hanlim; Mueller, Stefan; Jeong, Young-Il.
Afiliação
  • Lee SM; Genewel Co. Ltd., Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
  • Park IK; Genewel Co. Ltd., Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
  • Kim YS; Genewel Co. Ltd., Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
  • Kim HJ; Genewel Co. Ltd., Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
  • Moon H; Mundipharma Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Singapore.
  • Mueller S; Mundipharma Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Singapore.
  • Jeong YI; Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179 Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan, 602-739 Republic of Korea.
Biomater Res ; 20: 15, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27274861
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We investigated the physicochemical properties of Medifoam® N and its wound healing performance compared to other commercially available polyurethane (PU) foam dressing in vitro and in vivo to gain insight in their clinical performance.

METHODS:

Wound contact layer and cross-section of eleven polyurethane foam dressings were assessed with field-emission scanning electron microscope. Thickness, density, tensile strength, elongation, moisture-vapor transmission rate (MVTR), retention and absorptivity were measured to compare physical properties. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution absorption patterns were compared. An animal model for wound-healing was applied to validate in vitro findings.

RESULTS:

Among eleven tested foam dressings, Medifoam® N has the smallest pore and cell sizes with excellent uniformity, i.e. it has 25 ~ 75 µm on the wound contact layer and 100 ~ 350 µm in the cross-section while other dressings have a larger pose size with larger variability. Compared to other PU foams, Medifoam® N also has moderate thickness, density, tensile strength, elongation and MVTR. Furthermore, it has excellent fluid absorption and retention capacity. These intrinsic properties of Medifoam® N contributed to improve fluid absorption patterns, i.e. other dressing material flawed out PBS solution on the dressings while Medifoam® N retained all the tested solutions. In animal wound-healing study, Medifoam® N treated animals showed excellent angiogenesis and collagen deposition even though epithelial recovery rate was not significantly different to other dressings.

CONCLUSIONS:

Medifoam® N has optimized physical properties and thus improved fluid absorption/retention capacity. Compared to other dressings, Medifoam® N showed excellent fluid absorption patterns and these characteristics contributed to improved wound healing and excellent angiogenic potential. We found that Medifoam® N showed the best results among the employed dressing samples.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Biomater Res Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Biomater Res Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article