Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Singh, Sonal; Wright, Eugene E; Kwan, Anita Y M; Thompson, Juliette C; Syed, Iqra A; Korol, Ellen E; Waser, Nathalie A; Yu, Maria B; Juneja, Rattan.
Afiliação
  • Singh S; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Wright EE; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center at the Southern Regional Area Health Education Center (AHEC), Fayetteville, North Carolina.
  • Kwan AY; Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center at the Southern Regional Area Health Education Center (AHEC), Fayetteville, North Carolina.
  • Thompson JC; Lilly USA, LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Syed IA; ICON Epidemiology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Korol EE; ICON Epidemiology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Waser NA; ICON Epidemiology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Yu MB; ICON Epidemiology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Juneja R; Eli Lilly Canada Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 19(2): 228-238, 2017 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27717130
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Since 2005, several glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been approved to treat people with type 2 diabetes. These agents are considered for use at the same point in the treatment paradigm as basal insulins. A comprehensive comparison of these drug classes, therefore, can help inform treatment decisions. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of GLP-1 RAs compared with basal insulins. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PubMed databases were searched. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ≥16 weeks' duration comparing GLP-1 RAs vs basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antihyperglycemic drugs were included. Data on the change from baseline to 26 weeks (±10 weeks) of treatment in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight, as well as the proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia, were extracted. Fixed-effect pairwise meta-analyses were conducted where data were available from ≥2 studies.

RESULTS:

Fifteen RCTs were identified and 11 were meta-analysed. The once-weekly GLP-1 RAs, exenatide long acting release (LAR) and dulaglutide, led to greater, statistically significant mean HbA1c reductions vs basal insulins (exenatide -0.31% [95% confidence interval -0.42, -0.19], dulaglutide -0.39% [-0.49, -0.29]) whilst once-daily liraglutide and twice-daily exenatide did not (liraglutide 0.06% [-0.06, 0.18], exenatide 0.01% [-0.11, 0.13]). Mean weight reduction was seen with all GLP-1 RAs while mean weight gain was seen with basal insulins. Interpretation of the analysis of hypoglycaemia was limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Because of the limited number of available studies sensitivity analyses to explore heterogeneity could not be conducted.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although weight reduction is seen with all GLP-1 RA's, only the once-weekly agents, exenatide LAR and dulaglutide, demonstrate significant HbA1c reductions when compared to basal insulins.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Incretinas / Hipoglicemiantes / Insulina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Obes Metab Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / METABOLISMO Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Incretinas / Hipoglicemiantes / Insulina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Obes Metab Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / METABOLISMO Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article