Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
X-Ray of Excised Cancerous Breast Tissue Does Not Affect Clinical Biomarker Expression.
Lloyd, Isaac E; Welm, Alana L; DeRose, Yoko; Neumayer, Leigh A; Kohan, Jessica L; Malmberg, Elisabeth M; Salama, Mohamed E; Factor, Rachel E.
Afiliação
  • Lloyd IE; Departments of Pathology.
  • Welm AL; Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • DeRose Y; Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Neumayer LA; Surgery, University of Utah.
  • Kohan JL; Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson and University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ.
  • Malmberg EM; ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Salama ME; ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Factor RE; ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol ; 26(7): 501-508, 2018 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28187031
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology have emphasized the need to reduce preanalytic variables for evaluating predictive biomarker expression in breast cancer. Postoperative x-ray of excised breast tissue is commonplace, yet is a variable that has not been investigated previously. We asked whether such radiation affects expression of relevant biomarkers.

DESIGN:

A previous study found that human breast cancers grown in mice demonstrate the same immunohistochemical and molecular profiles as the original tumors. Thirteen patient-derived xenografts were harvested fresh and divided for specimen radiography and a matched nonirradiated control, while following CAP/ASCO guidelines for cold ischemia time and fixation. Samples were processed in a tissue microarray for immunohistochemistry. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), p53, and Ki67 staining was evaluated using an optimized scoring algorithm performed on digitally scanned slides. Samples were also scored manually by a blinded pathologist using the H-score method, and HER2 by the CAP/ASCO 2013 protocol. Histologic scores were compared by analysis of variance.

RESULTS:

There was no significant difference in quantity or intensity of staining between irradiated and nonirradiated samples for estrogen receptor (P=0.28), p53 (P=0.96), and Ki67 (P=0.94). A small but statistically significant difference was observed for PR (P=0.0058). HER2 staining was similarly unchanged in the 1 tumor exhibiting 3+ staining.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study demonstrates that x-ray of breast carcinomas does not significantly affect the expression of predictive biomarkers, with the exception of PR for unclear reasons. It also highlights the utility of the patient-derived xenograft model for biomarker studies.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raios X / Neoplasias da Mama / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR / HISTOCITOQUIMICA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raios X / Neoplasias da Mama / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR / HISTOCITOQUIMICA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article