Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Management of a progressing prostate cancer: results of a national study]. / Surveillance et adaptation de la stratégie thérapeutique en cas de progression de la maladie dans le cancer de la prostate avancé : résultats d'une enquête nationale.
Rozet, F; Roupret, M; Hennequin, C; Massard, C; Blanchard, P; Le Moulec, S.
Afiliação
  • Rozet F; Institut Montsouris, université Paris Descartes, 42, boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France. Electronic address: francois.rozet@imm.fr.
  • Roupret M; Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, faculté de médecine Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, université Paris 6, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
  • Hennequin C; Hôpital St-Louis, université Paris Diderot, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.
  • Massard C; Institut Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France.
  • Blanchard P; Institut Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France.
  • Le Moulec S; Institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Prog Urol ; 27(6): 381-388, 2017 May.
Article em Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28392429
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The introduction of new treatments in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) requires a close follow-up to detect a progression and then to adapt the treatment. In that context, a national survey was proposed to a group of experts and the aim was to identify the modalities of surveillance in different clinical situations.

METHODS:

A questionnaire was sent to 1464 urologists, medical oncologists and radiotherapists, about a clinical case; it was about a patient presenting a prostate cancer, evolving from a biologic progression after radical prostatectomy to a situation of metastasis resistant to the castration. The questionnaire contained ten questions about reasons of changing treatment because of progression, and about modalities of the follow-up.

RESULTS:

A total of 318 questionnaires were analyzed (response rate of 22%). The results showed comparable practices between the different types of specialists, even if a more frequent rhythm of surveillance was reported by medical oncologists and radiotherapists. At progression after radical prostatectomy, a clinical and biological surveillance was generally realized every 3 or 6 months, and imaging exams were done on demand. Then, as the cancer progresses, the surveillance became systematic and more and more close, with imaging done every 3 months or on demand. While the definition of progression was essentially based on PSA testing at the beginning of the castration resistance, it then combines different clinical, biological and radiological criteria.

CONCLUSIONS:

There are few recommendations available about follow-up of patients with a mCRPC. In that survey, the oncologists and urologists reported a more intensive rhythm of surveillance as the prostate cancer progresses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Fr Revista: Prog Urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Fr Revista: Prog Urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article