An update of 77 cases diagnosed as oral hemangiomas based on GLUT-1 positivity.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate cases diagnosed as "oral hemangiomas" based on the immunohistochemical expression of human glucose transporter protein (GLUT-1) and on histopathological features, and to investigate whether the classification proposed by the ISSVA was used correctly to classify these lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All cases stored in the archives of an Oral Pathology Service and diagnosed as "oral hemangiomas" were reviewed. Seventy-seven cases were analyzed regarding the expression of GLUT-1. GLUT-1(+) specimens were classified as true infantile hemangioma (IH) and GLUT-1(-) specimens were reclassified based on their histopathological features. The nomenclature of these lesions was evaluated and some cases were reclassified. RESULTS: Only 26 (33.8%) of the specimens were indeed IHs. Among the GLUT-1(-) specimens, 20 (26.0%) were reclassified as pyogenic granulomas (PGs) and 31 (40.2%) as vascular malformations. Considering the previously applied nomenclature, only 47.5% of the cases initially diagnosed as "hemangiomas" were IHs. In the group of "capillary hemangiomas", most cases (56.2%) were PGs. Among the three "cellular hemangiomas", two were PGs and one was IH. Most (88.8%) "cavernous hemangiomas" were vascular malformations. CONCLUSION: Careful and parameterized review of cases of vascular anomalies is necessary using auxiliary tools such as GLUT-1, since the exclusive use of histopathological findings might be insufficient to differentiate some anomalies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Accurate clinical examination and the use of biomarkers such as GLUT-1 are essential for the diagnosis.