Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the new-generation Evolut R™: Comparison with CoreValve® in a single center cohort.
Schulz, Eberhard; Jabs, Alexander; Gori, Tommaso; von Bardeleben, Stephan; Hink, Ulrich; Kasper-König, Walter; Vahl, Christian Friedrich; Münzel, Thomas.
Afiliação
  • Schulz E; Center for Cardiology, Cardiology 1, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany.
  • Jabs A; Center for Cardiology, Cardiology 1, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany.
  • Gori T; Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • von Bardeleben S; Center for Cardiology, Cardiology 1, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany.
  • Hink U; Center for Cardiology, Cardiology 1, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany.
  • Kasper-König W; Center for Cardiology, Cardiology 1, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany.
  • Vahl CF; Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Münzel T; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ; 12: 52-56, 2016 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28616543
BACKGROUND: The Medtronic Evolut R (EVR) is a novel transcatheter heart valve designed to allow precise implantation at the intended position and to minimize prosthesis dysfunction as well as procedural complications. Our aim was to compare short-term functional and clinical outcomes of the new EVR with the established Medtronic CoreValve (CV) system. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 151 patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a self-expanding valve at our institution between January 2013 and January 2016, 86 were treated with EVR and 65 with CV. Patients treated with EVR had a significantly lower rate of more-than-mild aortic regurgitation and a higher rate of device success. Recapture maneuvers to optimize valve deployment were performed in 22.1% of the EVR procedures. Transvalvular post-procedural gradients were slightly higher in the EVR group, while no differences were observed in the incidence of safety endpoints at 30 days, vascular complications, or need for permanent pacemaker implantation following asystole or complete atrioventricular block. CONCLUSIONS: These initial single-center experience data on the short-term outcomes after EVR valve implantation show a substantially reduced rate of more-than-mild paravalvular regurgitation and higher device success, while 30-day safety outcomes were similar to the CV system. Clinical outcome data from long-term follow-up and larger scale multicenter experience are now necessary.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha