Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimating the Comparative Effectiveness of Feeding Interventions in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Demonstration of Longitudinal Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
Kreif, Noémi; Tran, Linh; Grieve, Richard; De Stavola, Bianca; Tasker, Robert C; Petersen, Maya.
Afiliação
  • Kreif N; Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
  • Tran L; Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
  • Grieve R; Centre for Statistical Methodology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • De Stavola B; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Tasker RC; Centre for Statistical Methodology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Petersen M; Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Epidemiol ; 186(12): 1370-1379, 2017 Dec 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28992064
Longitudinal data sources offer new opportunities for the evaluation of sequential interventions. To adjust for time-dependent confounding in these settings, longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood based estimation (TMLE), a doubly robust method that can be coupled with machine learning, has been proposed. This paper provides a tutorial in applying longitudinal TMLE, in contrast to inverse probability of treatment weighting and g-computation based on iterative conditional expectations. We apply these methods to estimate the causal effect of nutritional interventions on clinical outcomes among critically ill children in a United Kingdom study (Control of Hyperglycemia in Paediatric Intensive Care, 2008-2011). We estimate the probability of a child's being discharged alive from the pediatric intensive care unit by a given day, under a range of static and dynamic feeding regimes. We find that before adjustment, patients who follow the static regime "never feed" are discharged by the end of the fifth day with a probability of 0.88 (95% confidence interval: 0.87, 0.90), while for the patients who follow the regime "feed from day 3," the probability of discharge is 0.64 (95% confidence interval: 0.62, 0.66). After adjustment for time-dependent confounding, most of this difference disappears, and the statistical methods produce similar results. TMLE offers a flexible estimation approach; hence, we provide practical guidance on implementation to encourage its wider use.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica / Modelos Estatísticos / Mortalidade Hospitalar / Estado Terminal / Métodos de Alimentação Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Am J Epidemiol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica / Modelos Estatísticos / Mortalidade Hospitalar / Estado Terminal / Métodos de Alimentação Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Am J Epidemiol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido