Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of intercenter sharing on the outcomes of pediatric split liver transplantation.
Elsabbagh, Ahmed M; Williams, Cassie; Girlanda, Raffaele; Hawksworth, Jason; Kroemer, Alexander; Matsumoto, Cal S; Fishbein, Thomas M.
Afiliação
  • Elsabbagh AM; MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
  • Williams C; MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
  • Girlanda R; MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
  • Hawksworth J; MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
  • Kroemer A; MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
  • Matsumoto CS; MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
  • Fishbein TM; MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Clin Transplant ; 31(12)2017 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29032604
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Split liver transplantation allows for expansion of the pool of organs available for pediatric liver transplantation. The impact of sharing segments of the same liver between centers has not been studied. STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective analysis of 24 pediatric split liver transplant cases in a recent cohort. We evaluated the outcomes of pediatric recipients who shared organs with adult patients in our own center (group A) compared to recipients who shared organs with adult patients in other centers. (group B).

RESULTS:

One-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival for group A was 100%, 100%, and 100% vs 83%, 71%, and 57% for group B (P = .039). Postoperative complications included biliary complications (41.7% in group A vs 50% in group B, P = .682), vascular complications (8.3% in group A vs 41.7% in group B, P = .059), and postoperative bleeding (16.7% in group A vs 25% in group B, P = .615). High-grade Clavien-Dindo complications were 0% in group A vs 33.3% in group B, P = .028.

CONCLUSIONS:

Organ sharing between centers appears to be associated with significantly poorer graft survival. Possible explanations include greater procurement-related injury or suboptimal vessel distribution. Future larger studies focused on this area may be helpful to formulate policy considerations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Doadores de Tecidos / Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Fígado Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Doadores de Tecidos / Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Fígado Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos