Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal Rhesus D genotype to guide antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Saramago, P; Yang, H; Llewellyn, A; Palmer, S; Simmonds, M; Griffin, S.
Afiliação
  • Saramago P; Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
  • Yang H; Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
  • Llewellyn A; Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
  • Palmer S; Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
  • Simmonds M; Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
  • Griffin S; Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
BJOG ; 125(11): 1414-1422, 2018 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29415334
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of high-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing (HT-NIPT) for fetal Rhesus D (RhD) genotype to guide antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin compared with routine antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis (RAADP).

DESIGN:

Cost-effectiveness decision-analytic modelling.

SETTING:

Primary care.

PARTICIPANTS:

A simulated population of 100 000 RhD-negative women not known to be sensitised to the RhD antigen.

METHODS:

A decision tree model was used to characterise the antenatal care pathway in England and the long-term consequences of sensitisation events. The diagnostic accuracy of HT-NIPT was derived from a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis; estimates of other inputs were derived from relevant literature sources and databases. Women in whom the HT-NIPT was positive or inconclusive continued to receive RAADP, whereas women with a negative result received none. Five alternative strategies in which the use of HT-NIPT may affect the existing postpartum care pathway were considered. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Costs expressed in 2015GBP and impact on health outcomes expressed in terms of quality-adjusted life-years over a lifetime.

RESULTS:

The results suggested that HT-NIPT appears cost saving but also less effective than current practice, irrespective of the postpartum strategy evaluated. A postpartum strategy in which inconclusive test results are distinguished from positive results performed best. HT-NIPT is only cost-effective when the overall test cost is £26.60 or less.

CONCLUSIONS:

HT-NIPT would reduce unnecessary treatment with routine anti-D immunoglobulin and is cost saving when compared with current practice. The extent of any savings and cost-effectiveness is sensitive to the overall test cost. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT HT-NIPT is cost saving compared with providing anti-D to all RhD-negative pregnant women.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Hematológicas na Gravidez / Cuidado Pré-Natal / Diagnóstico Pré-Natal / Sistema do Grupo Sanguíneo Rh-Hr / Isoimunização Rh Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BJOG Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Hematológicas na Gravidez / Cuidado Pré-Natal / Diagnóstico Pré-Natal / Sistema do Grupo Sanguíneo Rh-Hr / Isoimunização Rh Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BJOG Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido