Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A 5-year prospective study on the clinical and aesthetic outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation and connective tissue graft at the buccal aspect of single implants.
Eghbali, Aryan; Seyssens, Lorenz; De Bruyckere, Thomas; Younes, Faris; Cleymaet, Roberto; Cosyn, Jan.
Afiliação
  • Eghbali A; Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Oral Health Research Group (ORHE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
  • Seyssens L; Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • De Bruyckere T; Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Younes F; Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Oral Health Research Group (ORHE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
  • Cleymaet R; Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Cosyn J; Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Oral Health Research Group (ORHE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
J Clin Periodontol ; 45(12): 1475-1484, 2018 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30290007
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To evaluate the 5-year aesthetic outcome of single implants following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) and connective tissue graft (CTG) at the buccal aspect. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Thirty-seven periodontally healthy non-smoking patients received flapless tooth extraction, ARP with a deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen (DBBMC), implant placement (4-6 months later), a provisional screw-retained crown and CTG at the buccal mucosa (3 months later) and a permanent crown (3 months later). The aesthetic results were the primary outcome and the clinical results the secondary outcome of the study. Both outcomes were compared to those after 1 year. Mucosal thickness (MT) was registered using a non-invasive ultrasonic device.

RESULTS:

Thirty-two patients attended the 5-year re-assessment, and all implants survived. Mean marginal bone loss was 0.53 mm at 1 year and 0.47 mm at 5 years (p = 0.439). Mesial Papilla showed a further re-growth between 1 and 5 years (p = 0.043). Mid-facial recession amounted to 0.05 mm and 0.12 mm at 1 and 5 years, respectively (p = 0.161). The Pink Esthetic Score was 11.00 and 11.17 at 1 and 5 years, respectively (p = 0.596). MT gain amounted to 0.97 mm (relative stability 90.5%) and 0.91 mm (relative stability 85%) at 1 and 5 years, respectively (p = 0.249).

CONCLUSION:

ARP and CTG resulted in favourable clinical and aesthetic outcomes. CTG substantially increased MT with acceptable stability over a 5-year period.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Periodontol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Periodontol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica