Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Models of Peer Support to Remediate Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Report Developed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine Thrive International Peer Support Collaborative.
McPeake, Joanne; Hirshberg, Eliotte L; Christie, Leeann M; Drumright, Kelly; Haines, Kimberley; Hough, Catherine L; Meyer, Joel; Wade, Dorothy; Andrews, Adair; Bakhru, Rita; Bates, Samantha; Barwise, John A; Bastarache, Julie; Beesley, Sarah J; Boehm, Leanne M; Brown, Sheryl; Clay, Alison S; Firshman, Penelope; Greenberg, Steven; Harris, Wendy; Hill, Christopher; Hodgson, Carol; Holdsworth, Clare; Hope, Aluko A; Hopkins, Ramona O; Howell, David C J; Janssen, Anna; Jackson, James C; Johnson, Annie; Kross, Erin K; Lamas, Daniela; MacLeod-Smith, Belinda; Mandel, Ruth; Marshall, John; Mikkelsen, Mark E; Nackino, Megan; Quasim, Tara; Sevin, Carla M; Slack, Andrew; Spurr, Rachel; Still, Mary; Thompson, Carol; Weinhouse, Gerald; Wilcox, M Elizabeth; Iwashyna, Theodore J.
Afiliação
  • McPeake J; NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Hirshberg EL; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Christie LM; Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, UT.
  • Drumright K; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Haines K; Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Hough CL; Dell Children's Medical Centre, Austin, TX.
  • Meyer J; VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
  • Wade D; VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
  • Andrews A; Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Bakhru R; Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Bates S; Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Barwise JA; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Bastarache J; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Beesley SJ; Society of Critical Care Medicine, Chicago, IL.
  • Boehm LM; Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy & Immunologic Diseases, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC.
  • Brown S; Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Clay AS; VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
  • Firshman P; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Greenberg S; VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
  • Harris W; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Hill C; Intermountain Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Murray, UT.
  • Hodgson C; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Holdsworth C; Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN.
  • Hope AA; VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Hopkins RO; Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
  • Howell DCJ; NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL.
  • Janssen A; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Jackson JC; Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Johnson A; Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
  • Kross EK; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Lamas D; VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
  • MacLeod-Smith B; Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Mandel R; Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Marshall J; Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Mikkelsen ME; Jay B Langer Critical Care System, New York, NY.
  • Nackino M; Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, UT.
  • Quasim T; Intermountain Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Murray, UT.
  • Sevin CM; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
  • Slack A; Critical Care Unit, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Spurr R; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Still M; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Thompson C; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Weinhouse G; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Wilcox ME; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Iwashyna TJ; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Crit Care Med ; 47(1): e21-e27, 2019 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30422863
OBJECTIVES: Patients and caregivers can experience a range of physical, psychologic, and cognitive problems following critical care discharge. The use of peer support has been proposed as an innovative support mechanism. DESIGN: We sought to identify technical, safety, and procedural aspects of existing operational models of peer support, among the Society of Critical Care Medicine Thrive Peer Support Collaborative. We also sought to categorize key distinctions between these models and elucidate barriers and facilitators to implementation. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Seventeen Thrive sites from the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia were represented by a range of healthcare professionals. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Via an iterative process of in-person and email/conference calls, members of the Collaborative defined the key areas on which peer support models could be defined and compared, collected detailed self-reports from all sites, reviewed the information, and identified clusters of models. Barriers and challenges to implementation of peer support models were also documented. Within the Thrive Collaborative, six general models of peer support were identified: community based, psychologist-led outpatient, models-based within ICU follow-up clinics, online, groups based within ICU, and peer mentor models. The most common barriers to implementation were recruitment to groups, personnel input and training, sustainability and funding, risk management, and measuring success. CONCLUSIONS: A number of different models of peer support are currently being developed to help patients and families recover and grow in the postcritical care setting.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Grupo Associado / Apoio Social / Estado Terminal / Sobreviventes / Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Grupo Associado / Apoio Social / Estado Terminal / Sobreviventes / Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido