Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation doses for endovascular aortic repairs performed on mobile and fixed C-arm fluoroscopes and procedure phase-specific radiation distribution.
Schaefers, Johannes Frederik; Wunderle, Kevin; Usai, Marco Virgilio; Torsello, Giovanni Federico; Panuccio, Giuseppe.
Afiliação
  • Schaefers JF; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Wunderle K; Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Usai MV; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Torsello GF; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Panuccio G; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. Electronic address: giuseppe.panuccio@ukmuenster.de.
J Vasc Surg ; 68(6): 1889-1896, 2018 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30473030
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to analyze radiation risk to patients during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using mobile C-arm (MA) or fixed C-arm (FA) fluoroscopes and to describe the dose distribution during the different phases of the procedure.

METHODS:

Patients treated with EVAR using a single stent graft system between November 2009 and June 2016 were included in this study. The patients were divided into one of two groups (MA or FA) according to the type of C-arm used in the procedure. Data regarding patients' demographics and the total amount of contrast agent (CA) used, dose-area product, and fluoroscopy time for the procedures were prospectively recorded. Based on the dose report from the FA system, five standard and two optional phases of the procedure were identified to determine the dose distribution.

RESULTS:

Overall, 160 patients were included (mean age, 73.30 ± 8.97 years; 146 men); of these, 107 were treated with an MA system and 53 were treated with an FA system. The mean amounts of CA used were 108.55 ± 42.28 mL in the MA group and 85.37 ± 38.79 mL in the FA group (P = .0014). The mean total dose-area product values were 49.93 ± 38.06 Gy·cm2 in the MA group and 168.34 ± 146.92 Gy·cm2 in the FA group (P < .0001). There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time between the groups. Per-phase analysis demonstrated that identification of the proximal landing zone and main body deployment required the most radiation, accounting for 24% of the total radiation dose. Overall, 47.6% of the exposure was due to digital subtraction angiography.

CONCLUSIONS:

Use of an FA system can significantly reduce the amount of CA needed but may also lead to higher radiation doses in EVAR procedures. Dose monitoring remains crucial for the safety of both patients and operators. A detailed analysis of dose distribution is possible with modern systems, which may improve the quality of monitoring in the future.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aorta / Doses de Radiação / Aortografia / Angiografia Digital / Radiografia Intervencionista / Tomógrafos Computadorizados / Exposição à Radiação / Implante de Prótese Vascular / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Surg Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aorta / Doses de Radiação / Aortografia / Angiografia Digital / Radiografia Intervencionista / Tomógrafos Computadorizados / Exposição à Radiação / Implante de Prótese Vascular / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Surg Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha