Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial.
Gu, Phillip; Lew, Daniel; Oh, Sun Jung; Vipani, Aarshi; Ko, Jeffrey; Hsu, Kevin; Mirakhor, Ebrahim; Pattisapu, Varun; Bullen, Tia; Fuller, Garth; Spiegel, Brennan M R; Almario, Christopher V.
Afiliação
  • Gu P; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Lew D; Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Oh SJ; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Vipani A; Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Ko J; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Hsu K; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Mirakhor E; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Pattisapu V; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Bullen T; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Fuller G; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Spiegel BMR; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Almario CV; Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 114(2): 305-314, 2019 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30730859
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

National societies provide little guidance regarding which colonoscopy bowel preps are best tolerated and most effective; this reflects a lack of comparative effectiveness studies that directly evaluate the available preps in a "real-world" setting. To address this gap, we conducted a prospective, commercially unfunded comparative effectiveness study of currently available bowel preps and measured their impact on bowel cleansing.

METHODS:

We included patients aged ≥18 years, who presented for an outpatient colonoscopy at a large medical center serving more than 70 academic and community-based endoscopists who are free to prescribe the bowel prep of their choice. The primary outcome was bowel cleansing quality as measured by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. We performed regression models with random effects on the outcomes to adjust for confounding.

RESULTS:

Approximately 4,339 colonoscopies were performed by 75 endoscopists. Magnesium citrate, MiraLAX with Gatorade, MoviPrep, OsmoPrep, Prepopik/Clenpiq, and Suprep all had significantly higher prep tolerability compared with GoLYTELY (all P < 0.05). For bowel cleansing, Suprep (7.28 ± 1.66; P < 0.001), MoviPrep (7.11 ± 1.62; P = 0.004), and MiraLAX with Gatorade (7.09 ± 1.64; P < 0.001) had higher total Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores compared with GoLYTELY (6.67 ± 1.87); there were no significant differences among the remaining preps. Split-prep dosing was associated with better cleansing; however, men, opioid and tricyclic antidepressent users, and patients with diabetes and cirrhosis had worse cleansing (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this prospective, real-world comparative effectiveness study of available bowel preps, we found that MiraLAX with Gatorade, MoviPrep, and Suprep were prospectively associated with superior tolerability and bowel cleansing.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Catárticos / Colonoscopia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Catárticos / Colonoscopia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos