Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Specialist breast cancer nurses' views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study.
Cruickshank, Susanne; Steel, Emma; Fenlon, Deborah; Armes, Jo; Banks, Elspeth; Humphris, Gerald.
Afiliação
  • Cruickshank S; Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland. Susanne.cruickshank@stir.ac.uk.
  • Steel E; Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland.
  • Fenlon D; College of Health and Human Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
  • Armes J; School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
  • Banks E; National Cancer Research Institute, Angel Building 407 St John Street, London, EC1V 4AD, UK.
  • Humphris G; School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TF, UK.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(1): 201-210, 2020 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30997595
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in people with breast cancer affects treatment recovery, quality of life, service utilisation and relationships. Our aim was to investigate how specialist breast cancer nurses (SBCN) respond to their patients' fears of cancer recurrence and analyse SBCN's views about embedding a new psychological intervention, the Mini-AFTERc, into their consultations.

METHOD:

A mixed methods sequential design was used, informed by normalisation process theory. Phase 1 UK SBCNs were emailed a web-based survey to investigate how breast cancer survivors' FCR is currently identified and managed, and their willingness to utilise the Mini-AFTERc. Phase 2 a purposive sample of respondents (n = 20) were interviewed to augment phase 1 responses, and explore views on the importance of addressing FCR, interest in the Mini-AFTERc intervention, its content, skills required and challenges to delivering the intervention.

RESULTS:

Ninety nurses responded to the survey. When SBCN's were asked to identify the proportion of patients experiencing FCR in their caseload, there was no consensus on the size of the problem or unmet need. They estimated that 20-100% people experience moderate FCR and 10-70% severe FCR. The interviews identified that clinical conversations are focused primarily on giving information about signs and symptoms of recurrence rather than addressing the psychological aspects of fear.

CONCLUSION:

Findings indicate wide variability in how FCR was identified, assessed and supported by a sample of UK SBCNs. The introduction of a structured intervention into practice was viewed favourably and has implications for nursing and health professional ways of working in all cancer services.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção / Transtornos Fóbicos / Neoplasias da Mama / Medo / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia / Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Sysrev_observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção / Transtornos Fóbicos / Neoplasias da Mama / Medo / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia / Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Sysrev_observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido