Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Objective function based ranking method for selection of optimal beam angles in IMRT.
Ramar, Natarajan; Meher, S R; Ranganathan, Vaitheeswaran; Perumal, Bojarajan; Kumar, Prashant; Anto, Gipson Joe; Etti, S Harikrishna.
Afiliação
  • Ramar N; Philips Health Systems, Philips India Ltd, Bangalore, India; Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
  • Meher SR; Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India. Electronic address: samirmeher@vit.ac.in.
  • Ranganathan V; Philips Health Systems, Philips India Ltd, Bangalore, India.
  • Perumal B; Philips Health Systems, Philips India Ltd, Bangalore, India; Department of Medical Physics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India.
  • Kumar P; Philips Health Systems, Philips India Ltd, Bangalore, India.
  • Anto GJ; Philips Health Systems, Philips India Ltd, Bangalore, India; Department of Medical Physics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India.
  • Etti SH; Department of Medical Physics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India.
Phys Med ; 69: 44-51, 2020 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31816504
ABSTRACT
We propose a novel method for the selection of optimal beam angles in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). The proposed approach uses an objective function based metric called "target-to-critical organ objective function ratio" to find out the optimal gantry angles. The beams are ranked based on this metric and are accordingly chosen for IMRT optimization. We have used the Pinnacle TPS (Philips Medical System V 16.2) for performing the IMRT optimization. In order to validate our approach, we have applied it in four clinical cases Head and Neck, Lung, Abdomen and Prostate. Basically, for all clinical cases, two set of plans were created with same clinical objectives, namely Equal angle plan (EA Plan) and Suitable angle Plan (SA Plan). In the EA plans, the beam angles were placed in an equiangular manner starting from the gantry angle of 0°. In the corresponding SA plans, the beam angles were decided using the guidance provided by the algorithm. The reduction in OAR mean dose and max dose obtained in SA plans is about 3 to 16% and 3 to 15% respectively depending upon the treatment site while obtaining equal target coverage as compared to their EA counterparts. It takes approximately 15-25 min to find the optimal beam angles. The results obtained from the clinical cases indicate that the plan quality is considerably improved when the beam angles are optimized using the proposed method.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA / BIOLOGIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA / BIOLOGIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia