Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of performance status on treatment outcomes: A real-world study of advanced urothelial cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Khaki, Ali Raza; Li, Ang; Diamantopoulos, Leonidas N; Bilen, Mehmet A; Santos, Victor; Esther, John; Morales-Barrera, Rafael; Devitt, Michael; Nelson, Ariel; Hoimes, Christopher J; Shreck, Evan; Assi, Hussein; Gartrell, Benjamin A; Sankin, Alex; Rodriguez-Vida, Alejo; Lythgoe, Mark; Pinato, David J; Drakaki, Alexandra; Joshi, Monika; Isaacsson Velho, Pedro; Hahn, Noah; Liu, Sandy; Alonso Buznego, Lucia; Duran, Ignacio; Moses, Marcus; Jain, Jayanshu; Murgic, Jure; Baratam, Praneeth; Barata, Pedro; Tripathi, Abhishek; Zakharia, Yousef; Galsky, Matthew D; Sonpavde, Guru; Yu, Evan Y; Shankaran, Veena; Lyman, Gary H; Grivas, Petros.
Afiliação
  • Khaki AR; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Li A; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Diamantopoulos LN; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Bilen MA; Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Santos V; Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Esther J; Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Morales-Barrera R; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Devitt M; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Nelson A; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Hoimes CJ; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Shreck E; Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
  • Assi H; Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
  • Gartrell BA; Section of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
  • Sankin A; Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
  • Rodriguez-Vida A; Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
  • Lythgoe M; Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
  • Pinato DJ; Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
  • Drakaki A; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Joshi M; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Isaacsson Velho P; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Hahn N; Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Liu S; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
  • Alonso Buznego L; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Duran I; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Moses M; Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Jain J; Marques de Valdecilla University Hospital, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
  • Murgic J; Marques de Valdecilla University Hospital, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
  • Baratam P; Department of Medicine and Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
  • Barata P; Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • Tripathi A; Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center, Sisters of Charity Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Zakharia Y; College of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Galsky MD; Department of Medicine and Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
  • Sonpavde G; Section of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
  • Yu EY; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • Shankaran V; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • Lyman GH; Genitourinary Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Grivas P; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Cancer ; 126(6): 1208-1216, 2020 03 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31829450
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent an appealing treatment for patients with advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) and a poor performance status (PS). However, the benefit of ICIs for patients with a poor PS remains unknown. It was hypothesized that a poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS (≥2 vs 0-1) would correlate with shorter overall survival (OS) in patients receiving ICIs.

METHODS:

In this retrospective cohort study, clinicopathologic, treatment, and outcome data were collected for patients with aUC who were treated with ICIs at 18 institutions (2013-2019). The overall response rate (ORR) and OS were compared for patients with an ECOG PS of 0 to 1 and patients with an ECOG PS ≥ 2 at ICI initiation. The association between a new ICI in the last 30 and 90 days of life (DOL) and death location was also tested.

RESULTS:

Of the 519 patients treated with ICIs, 395 and 384 were included in OS and ORR analyses, respectively, with 26% and 24% having a PS ≥ 2. OS was higher in those with a PS of 0 to 1 than those with a PS ≥ 2 who were treated in the first line (median, 15.2 vs 7.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; P = .01) but not in subsequent lines (median, 9.8 vs 8.2 months; HR, 0.78; P = .27). ORRs were similar for patients with a PS of 0 to 1 and patients with a PS ≥ 2 in both lines. Of the 288 patients who died, 10% and 32% started ICIs in the last 30 and 90 DOL, respectively. ICI initiation in the last 30 DOL was associated with increased odds of death in a hospital (odds ratio, 2.89; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite comparable ORRs, ICIs may not overcome the negative prognostic role of a poor PS, particularly in the first-line setting, and the initiation of ICIs in the last 30 DOL was associated with hospital death location.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Neoplasias Urológicas / Antígeno B7-H1 / Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1 / Imunoterapia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Neoplasias Urológicas / Antígeno B7-H1 / Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1 / Imunoterapia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article