Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally Invasive CABG or Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for Multivessel Coronary Diseases: Which Is Best? A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.
Guan, Zhiyuan; Zhang, Zhe; Gu, Kaiyun; Wang, Heqing; Lin, Jin; Zhou, Wenjun; Wan, Feng.
Afiliação
  • Guan Z; Department of Cardiology Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang Z; Department of Cardiology Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
  • Gu K; Department of Cardiology Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
  • Wang H; Department of Cardiology Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
  • Lin J; Department of Cardiology Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
  • Zhou W; Department of Cardiology Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
  • Wan F; Department of Cardiology Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Heart Surg Forum ; 22(6): E493-E502, 2019 12 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31895036
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Minimally invasive coronary revascularization (MICR) involves minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (RCABG), and hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) aims to combine MICR/RCABG on left anterior descending (LAD) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) on non-LAD lesions. We performed a systematic review and metaanalysis to compare clinical outcome after MICR and HCR.

METHODS:

A metaanalysis was carried out through searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Medline for comparative studies evaluating the primary and secondary clinical end points.

RESULTS:

A systematic literature search identified 8 observational studies that satisfied our inclusion criteria, including being suitable for metaanalysis; the studies were between 1990 and 2018 and included 1084 cases of HCR and 2349 cases of MICR. Metaanalysis of these studies showed that HCR was associated with a reduced need for ICU LOS (WMD -11.46 hours, 95% CI, -18.76 ~ -4.25, P = .02), to hospital time (WMD -1.34 hours, 95% CI, -2.42 to 0.26, P < .01), and blood transfusion (OR 0.43, 95% CI, 0.31-0.59, P < .00001) than MICR. Comparisons of individual components showed no significant difference in terms of in-hospital mortality, MACCE, shock, myocardial infarction (MI), long-term survival, total variable cost, and surgical complications (including renal failure, chest drainage, bleeding).

CONCLUSIONS:

HCR was noninferior to MICR in terms of in-hospital mortality, MACCE, shock, MI, long-term survival, total variable cost, and surgical complications (including renal failure, chest drainage, bleeding), whereas HCR was associated with a reduced need for ICU LOS, hospital time, and blood transfusion than MICR and less infection than MICR. Further randomized studies are warranted to corroborate these observational data.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Ponte de Artéria Coronária / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos / Revascularização Miocárdica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Heart Surg Forum Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Ponte de Artéria Coronária / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos / Revascularização Miocárdica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Heart Surg Forum Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China