Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion.
Webster, Lynn; Gudin, Jeffrey; Raffa, Robert B; Kuchera, Jay; Rauck, Richard; Fudin, Jeffrey; Adler, Jeremy; Mallick-Searle, Theresa.
Afiliação
  • Webster L; PRA Health Sciences, San Diego, California.
  • Gudin J; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, Englewood, New Jersey; Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
  • Raffa RB; College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Kuchera J; Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Neumentum Inc, Palo Alto, California.
  • Rauck R; Resolute Pain Solutions, Okeechobee, Florida.
  • Fudin J; Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
  • Adler J; Remitigate LLC, Delmar, New York; Western New England University College of Pharmacy, Springfield, Massachusetts.
  • Mallick-Searle T; Albany College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Albany, New York.
Pain Med ; 21(4): 714-723, 2020 04 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31917418
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

An expert panel convened to reach a consensus on common misconceptions surrounding buprenorphine, a Schedule III partial µ-opioid receptor agonist indicated for chronic pain. The panel also provided clinical recommendations on the appropriate use of buprenorphine and conversion strategies for switching to buprenorphine from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist for chronic pain management.

METHODS:

The consensus panel met on March 25, 2019, to discuss relevant literature and provide recommendations on interpreting buprenorphine as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist, prescribing buprenorphine before some Schedule II, III, or IV options, perioperative/trauma management of patients taking buprenorphine, and converting patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine.

RESULTS:

The panel recommended that buprenorphine's classification as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist not be clinically translated to mean partial analgesic efficacy. The panel also recommended that buprenorphine be considered before some Schedule II, III, or IV opioids in patients with a favorable risk/benefit profile on the basis of metabolic factors, abuse potential, and tolerability and that buprenorphine be continued during the perioperative/trauma period. In addition, switching patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine should be considered with no weaning period at starting doses that are based on the previous opioid dose.

CONCLUSIONS:

These recommendations provide a framework for clinicians to address most clinical scenarios regarding buprenorphine use. The overall consensus of the panel was that buprenorphine is a unique Schedule III opioid with favorable pharmacologic properties and a safety profile that may be desirable for chronic pain management.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Buprenorfina / Dor Crônica / Analgésicos Opioides Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pain Med Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Buprenorfina / Dor Crônica / Analgésicos Opioides Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pain Med Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article