Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementing Common Metrics across the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) consortium.
Daudelin, Denise H; Peterson, Laura E; Welch, Lisa C; Chandler, Redonna; Pandey, Mridu; Noubary, Farzad; Lee, Philip L; Selker, Harry P.
Afiliação
  • Daudelin DH; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Peterson LE; Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Welch LC; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Chandler R; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Pandey M; The National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Noubary F; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Lee PL; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Selker HP; Clear Impact, LLC, Rockville, MD, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci ; 4(1): 16-21, 2020 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32257406
ABSTRACT
The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Consortium and the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) undertook a Common Metrics Initiative to improve research processes across the national CTSA Consortium. This was implemented by Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute at the 64 CTSA academic medical centers. Three metrics were collaboratively developed by NCATS staff, CTSA Consortium teams, and outside consultants for Institutional Review Board Review Duration, Careers in Clinical and Translational Research, and Pilot Award Publications and Subsequent Funding. The implementation program included training on the metric operational guidelines, data collection, data reporting system, and performance improvement framework. The implementation team provided small-group coaching and technical assistance. Collaborative learning sessions, driver diagrams, and change packages were used to disseminate best and promising practices. After 14 weeks, 84% of hubs had produced a value for one metric and about half had produced an initial improvement plan. Overall, hubs reported that the implementation activities facilitated their Common Metrics performance improvement process. Experiences implementing the first three metrics can inform future directions of the Common Metrics Initiative and other research groups implementing standardized metrics and performance improvement processes, potentially including other National Institutes of Health institutes and centers.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Transl Sci Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Transl Sci Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos