Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Severe asthma and eligibility for biologics in a Brazilian cohort.
Marques Mello, Luane; Viana, Karynna P; Moraes Dos Santos, Felipe; Saturnino, Luciana T M; Kormann, Michelle L; Lazaridis, Evelyn; Torreão, Cinthia D; Soares, Claudia R; Abreu, Gabriela A; Lima, Valmar Bião de; Pinheiro, Gabriela P; Lima-Matos, Aline; Ponte, Eduardo Vieira; Mohan, Divya; Riley, John H; Cruz, Alvaro A.
Afiliação
  • Marques Mello L; Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
  • Viana KP; GSK, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Moraes Dos Santos F; GSK, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Saturnino LTM; GSK, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Kormann ML; GSK, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Lazaridis E; GSK, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Torreão CD; GSK, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Soares CR; GSK, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Abreu GA; GSK, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Lima VB; ProAR Foundation and Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
  • Pinheiro GP; ProAR Foundation and Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
  • Lima-Matos A; Faculdade de Medicine de Jundiaí (School of Medicine), Jequié, Brazil.
  • Ponte EV; Jundiaí Foundation Medicine, Jundiaí, Brazil.
  • Mohan D; GSK, Medical Innovation Group, VEO, Collegeville, PA, USA.
  • Riley JH; GSK, Medicines Research Centre, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
  • Cruz AA; ProAR Foundation and Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
J Asthma ; 58(7): 958-966, 2021 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32270729
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the eligibility for biologic therapies for severe asthma (SA) in a cohort of patients attending the Program for Control of Asthma (ProAR) in Bahia, Brazil. METHODS: Data from SA patients (≥18 years old) attending the ProAR, that were included in a case-control study conducted from 2013 to 2015, were used to reassess patients according to a modified ERS/ATS 2014 SA criteria. Patients were then classified according to the eligibility for SA biological therapy based on current prescription labels. RESULTS: From 544 patients in the cohort, 531 (97.6%) were included and 172 (32.4%) were identified as SA patients according to the ERS/ATS 2014 modified criteria. Of these 172 patients, 69 (40.1%) were ineligible for any of the biologicals approved for asthma (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab and benralizumab), 60 (34.9%) patients were eligible for one of the biological therapies, and 10 (5.8%) patients were eligible for all biological therapies. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of patients with SA were eligible for biologic therapy in our study, but none of them received this form of treatment. Almost half of them were not eligible to any of the approved biologics, however. The variability and overlap in patients' eligibility highlight the importance of evaluating each patient individually for a more personalized treatment approach. While there is a need to increase access for some of those eligible that may really need a biologic treatment, continuous efforts are required to develop alternatives to those who are not eligible.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Produtos Biológicos / Antiasmáticos / Definição da Elegibilidade Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: J Asthma Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Produtos Biológicos / Antiasmáticos / Definição da Elegibilidade Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: J Asthma Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil