Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A frame of reference for assessing the intensity of exertional dyspnoea during incremental cycle ergometry.
Neder, J Alberto; Berton, Danilo C; Nery, Luiz E; Tan, Wan C; Bourbeau, Jean; O'Donnell, Denis E.
Afiliação
  • Neder JA; Laboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada alberto.neder@queensu.ca.
  • Berton DC; Division of Respirology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Nery LE; Pulmonary Function and Clinical Exercise Physiology Unit (SEFICE), Division of Respirology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Tan WC; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Bourbeau J; Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Research Institute of the McGill, University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • O'Donnell DE; Laboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Eur Respir J ; 56(4)2020 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32471934
ABSTRACT
Assessment of dyspnoea severity during incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has long been hampered by the lack of reference ranges as a function of work rate (WR) and ventilation (V' E). This is particularly relevant to cycling, a testing modality which overtaxes the leg muscles leading to a heightened sensation of leg discomfort.Reference ranges based on dyspnoea percentiles (0-10 Borg scale) at standardised work rates and V' E were established in 275 apparently healthy subjects aged 20-85 years (131 men). They were compared with values recorded in a randomly selected "validation" sample (n=451; 224 men). Their usefulness in properly uncovering the severity of exertional dyspnoea were tested in 167 subjects under investigation for chronic dyspnoea ("testing sample") who terminated CPET due to leg discomfort (86 men).Iso-work rate and, to a lesser extent, iso-V' E reference ranges (5th-25th, 25th-50th, 50-75th and 75th-95th percentiles) increased as a function of age, being systematically higher in women (p<0.01). There were no significant differences in percentiles distribution between "reference" and "validation" samples (p>0.05). Submaximal dyspnoea-work rate scores fell within the 75th-95th or >95th percentiles in 108 out of 118 (91.5%) subjects of the "testing" sample who showed physiological abnormalities known to elicit exertional dyspnoea, i.e. ventilatory inefficiency and/or critical inspiratory constraints. In contrast, dyspnoea scores typically fell in the 5th-50th range in subjects without those abnormalities (p<0.001).This frame of reference might prove useful to uncover the severity of exertional dyspnoea in subjects who otherwise would be labelled as "non-dyspnoeic" while providing mechanistic insights into the genesis of this distressing symptom.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dispneia / Teste de Esforço Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur Respir J Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dispneia / Teste de Esforço Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur Respir J Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá