Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The French National Cochlear Implant Registry (EPIIC): Cochlear implantation in adults over 65years old.
Mosnier, I; Ferrary, E; Aubry, K; Bordure, P; Bozorg-Grayeli, A; Deguine, O; Eyermann, C; Franco-Vidal, V; Godey, B; Guevara, N; Karkas, A; Klopp, N; Labrousse, M; Lebreton, J-P; Lerosey, Y; Lescanne, E; Loundon, N; Marianowski, R; Merklen, F; Mezouaghi, K; Mom, T; Moreau, S; Noël-Petroff, N; Parietti-Winkler, C; Piller, P; Poncet, C; Radafy, E; Roman, S; Roux-Vaillard, S; Schmerber, S; Tavernier, L; Truy, E; Vincent, C; Sterkers, O.
Afiliação
  • Mosnier I; AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Service ORL, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France. Electronic address: isabelle.mosnier@aphp.fr.
  • Ferrary E; AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Service ORL, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France.
  • Aubry K; CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.
  • Bordure P; CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Bozorg-Grayeli A; CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
  • Deguine O; CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
  • Eyermann C; CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Franco-Vidal V; CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Godey B; CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
  • Guevara N; CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
  • Karkas A; CHU de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.
  • Klopp N; CHU d'Amiens, Amiens, France.
  • Labrousse M; CHU de Reims, Reims, France.
  • Lebreton JP; CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
  • Lerosey Y; CHU de Rouen, Rouen, France.
  • Lescanne E; CHU de Tours, Tours, France.
  • Loundon N; Hôpital Necker, Paris, France.
  • Marianowski R; CHU de Brest, Brest, France.
  • Merklen F; CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  • Mezouaghi K; CH de La Réunion, La Réunion. Electronic address: kmezouaghi@irsam.fr.
  • Mom T; CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Moreau S; CHU de Caen, Caen, France.
  • Noël-Petroff N; Hôpital Robert-Debré, Paris, France.
  • Parietti-Winkler C; CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Piller P; CH de Nouméa, Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie.
  • Poncet C; Hôpital Rothschild, Paris, France.
  • Radafy E; CH du Lamentin, Martinique, Guadeloupe.
  • Roman S; CHU de Marseille, Marseille, France.
  • Roux-Vaillard S; CHU d'Angers, Angers, France.
  • Schmerber S; CHU de Grenoble, La Tronche, France.
  • Tavernier L; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France.
  • Truy E; CHU de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • Vincent C; CHU de Lille, Lille, France.
  • Sterkers O; AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Service ORL, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S19-S25, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773333
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To analyze the performance of cochlear implants in French patients aged 65 and over, implanted between 2012 and 2016, using data from the French national registry for cochlear implants (EPIIC). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The French national registry incorporates patient data from before implantation and for three years after implantation, stratified in different age groups (18-39, 40-64years, 65-74years and>75years). Here, we assessed the latter two categories. Hearing was assessed using mono- and disyllabic words in a silent background. The Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) scale was also implemented and subjects took the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (Aphab) questionnaire.

RESULTS:

The population aged over 65 accounted for 38% (n=1193) of the 3178 adult implanted patients. The performance for mono- and disyllabic words in silence, the CAP scores and the APHAB questionnaire answers for ease of communication, background noise and reverberation were dramatically improved at one year post-implantation (P<0.0001 for each score) and remained stable between one and three years thereafter. The percentage improvement was similar across all age groups. The scores for loud-noise intolerance did not change after cochlear implantation in any age group.

CONCLUSION:

Cochlear implants improve hearing and communication in subjects aged 65 and over, with comparable efficiency to that achieved in younger subjects. Cochlear implantation should thus be proposed whenever hearing aids provide only limited benefit. However, between 2012 and 2016, cochlear implantation was given to less than 1% of the French population aged 65 and over with profound deafness.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistema de Registros / Implantes Cocleares / Implante Coclear / Perda Auditiva Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistema de Registros / Implantes Cocleares / Implante Coclear / Perda Auditiva Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article