Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of a hydrogel spacer on the intrafractional prostate motion during CyberKnife treatment for prostate cancer.
Suzuki, Toshihiro; Saito, Masahide; Onishi, Hiroshi; Mochizuki, Zennosuke; Mochizuki, Koji; Satani, Kenichiro; Sano, Naoki; Aoki, Shinichi; Marino, Kan; Komiyama, Takafumi; Takahashi, Hiroshi.
Afiliação
  • Suzuki T; Kasugai CyberKnife Rehabilitation Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Saito M; Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Onishi H; Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Mochizuki Z; Kasugai CyberKnife Rehabilitation Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Mochizuki K; Kasugai CyberKnife Rehabilitation Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Satani K; Kasugai CyberKnife Rehabilitation Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Sano N; Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Aoki S; Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Marino K; Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Komiyama T; Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Takahashi H; Kasugai CyberKnife Rehabilitation Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 2020 Aug 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33058517
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a hydrogel spacer on intrafractional prostate motion during CyberKnife treatment. The retrospective study enrolled 24 patients (with the hydrogel spacer = 12, without the hydrogel spacer = 12) with two fiducial markers. Regarding intrafractional prostate motion, the offset values (mm) of three axes (X-axis; superior [+] to inferior [-], Y-axis; right [+] to left [-], Z-axis; posterior [+] to anterior [-]) obtained from fiducial markers position between a digitally reconstructed radiographs images and live images in the Target Locating System were used, and extracted from generated log files. The mean values of the offset and each standard deviation were calculated for each patient, and both the groups were compared. For all the patients, a total of 2204 offset values and timestamps (without the hydrogel spacer group 1065, with the hydrogel spacer group 1139) were recorded for the X-, Y-, and Z-axes, respectively. The offset values (mean ± standard deviation) for the X-, Y-, and Z-axes were -0.04 ± 0.92 mm, -0.03 ± 0.97 mm (P = 0.66), 0.02 ± 0.51, -0.02 ± 0.49 mm (P = 0.50), and 0.56 ± 0.97 mm, 0.34 ± 1.07 mm (P = 0.14), in patients inserted without or with the hydrogel spacer, respectively. There was no effect of a hydrogel spacer on the intrafractional prostate motion in the three axes during CyberKnife treatment for prostate cancer.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão