Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multiparametric MRI-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in patients without prior diagnosis of prostate cancer: beyond centers of excellence.
Verma, Sadhna; Zegar, Joseph; Hoge, Connor; McGready, John; Sidana, Abhinav.
Afiliação
  • Verma S; Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Zegar J; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Hoge C; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • McGready J; Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Sidana A; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Aging Male ; 23(5): 1570-1575, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33446002
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-ultrasound (US) fusion prostate biopsy (FBx) has demonstrated increased accuracy for prostate cancer detection at designated centers of excellence. There is a concern if their results can be reproduced in smaller centers. Here, we evaluate the outcomes of FBx from a smaller academic center.

METHODS:

A retrospective review of patients without a prior diagnosis of prostate cancer undergoing FBx from January 2014 to November 2019 was performed. Histopathological results were grouped into low-risk disease (Grade Group 1), intermediate-risk disease (Grade Group 2 and 3), and high-risk disease (Grade Group 4 or 5). Clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer was defined as Grade Group ≥ 2.

RESULTS:

Five hundred and six men were included. Median age (IQR) and PSA (IQR) were 65.2 (60.3-70.2) years and 6.9 (5.2-9.7) ng/ml, respectively. There was no difference in overall cancer detection between FBx and SBx (53.6% vs 56.4% p = .1507). CS cancer detection was significantly higher with FBx (39.6% vs 35.3, p = .0275). FBx also outperformed SBx in diagnosing CS disease in patients with prior history of negative prostate biopsy (36.9% vs 27.9%, p < .001).

CONCLUSION:

FBx detects a higher proportion of clinically significant disease and a lower proportion of clinically insignificant disease compared to SBx, in line with outcomes demonstrated by centers of excellence.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Aging Male Assunto da revista: GERIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Aging Male Assunto da revista: GERIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos