Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acceptability and Adequacy of a Non-endoscopic Cell Collection Device for Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus: Lessons Learned.
Shaheen, Nicholas J; Komanduri, Srinadh; Muthusamy, V Raman; Wani, Sachin; O'Donovan, Maria; Kaushal, Rajinder; Haydek, John M.
Afiliação
  • Shaheen NJ; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, 130 Mason Farm Rd, Suite 4150, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA. nicholas_shaheen@med.unc.edu.
  • Komanduri S; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Muthusamy VR; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Wani S; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • O'Donovan M; Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
  • Kaushal R; University of California, Los Angeles, Santa Clarita, CA, USA.
  • Haydek JM; Gastrointestinal Associates, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Dig Dis Sci ; 67(1): 177-186, 2022 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33532971
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Endoscopic screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) is common, costly, and underperformed in at-risk people. A non-endoscopic cell collection device can be used to collect esophageal cells, enabling BE screening.

AIMS:

This study assessed the acceptability and adequacy of a commercial non-endoscopic cell collection device in a US population.

METHODS:

Six sites enrolled patients with confirmed BE or heartburn/regurgitation for ≥ 6 months. Patients underwent administration of the device, consisting of a sponge encapsulated in a capsule. The capsule dwelled in the stomach for 7.5 min and was retracted via an attached suture. An adequate sample was ≥ 1 columnar cell by H&E staining. Sample quality was rated using a 0-5 scale, with 0 = no columnar cells and 5 = plentiful groups. Trefoil Factor 3 (TFF3) staining was performed. Accuracy was assessed using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)/biopsy as the gold standard.

RESULTS:

Of 191 patients, 99.5% successfully swallowed the device. Overall sample adequacy was 91% (171/188), with 84% (158/188) high quality. The detachment rate was 2/190 (1%). Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the assay with TFF3 staining were 76%, 77%, and 76%. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for ≥ 3 cm BE were 86%, 77%, and 82%. Asked if willing to repeat the procedure, 93% would, and 65% indicated a preference for the device over EGD.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrated a high rate of sample adequacy and promising acceptability of this non-endoscopic sampling device in a US population. Diagnostic characteristics suggest that non-endoscopic assessment of BE deserves further development as an alternative to endoscopy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esôfago de Barrett / Biópsia / Esôfago / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Dig Dis Sci Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esôfago de Barrett / Biópsia / Esôfago / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Dig Dis Sci Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos