Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of a renal pharmacist consultant service - Information sharing in paper versus digital form.
Seiberth, Sarah; Bauer, Dominik; Schönermarck, Ulf; Mannell, Hanna; Stief, Christian; Hasford, Joerg; Strobach, Dorothea.
Afiliação
  • Seiberth S; Hospital Pharmacy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Bauer D; Doctoral Program Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Schönermarck U; Doctoral Program Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Mannell H; Department of Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Stief C; Doctoral Program Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Hasford J; Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Strobach D; Institute of Medical Data Processing, Biometrics and Epidemiology (IBE), Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 46(3): 838-845, 2021 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33609054
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Renal impairment (RI) and renal drug-related problems (rDRP) often remain unrecognized in the community setting. A "renal pharmacist consultant service" (RPCS) at hospital admission can support patient safety by detecting rDRP. However, the efficient information sharing from pharmacists to physicians is still discussed. The aim of the study was to test the implementation of a RPCS and its effectiveness on prescription changes and to evaluate two ways of written information sharing with physicians. METHODS: Urological patients with eGFRnon-indexed of 15-59 ml/min and ≥1 drug were reviewed for manifest and potential rDRP at admission by a pharmacist. Written recommendations for dose or drug adaptation were forwarded to physicians comparing two routes: July-September 2017 paper form in handwritten chart; November 2017-January 2018 digital PDF document in the electronic patient information system and e-mail alert. Prescription changes regarding manifest rDRP were evaluated and compared with a previous retrospective study without RPCS. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The RPCS detected rDRP in 63 of 234 (26.9%) patients and prepared written recommendations (median 1 rDRP (1-5) per patient) concerning 110 of 538 (20.5%) drugs at admission. For manifest rDRP, acceptance rates of recommendations were 62.5% (paper) vs 42.9% (digital) (P = 0.16). Compared with the retrospective study without RPCS (prescription changes in 21/76 rDRP; 27.6%), correct prescribing concerning manifest rDRP significantly increased by 27.1%. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: A RPCS identifies patients at risk for rDRP and significantly increases appropriate prescribing by physicians. In our hospital (no electronic order entry, electronic chart or ward pharmacists), consultations in paper form seem to be superior to a digital PDF document.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Admissão do Paciente / Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar / Redação / Consultores / Insuficiência Renal / Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Pharm Ther Assunto da revista: FARMACIA / TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Admissão do Paciente / Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar / Redação / Consultores / Insuficiência Renal / Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Pharm Ther Assunto da revista: FARMACIA / TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha