Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of HPV in Spain.
Ibáñez, R; Mareque, M; Granados, R; Andía, D; García-Rojo, M; Quílez, J C; Oyagüez, I.
Afiliação
  • Ibáñez R; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Mareque M; Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, Spain. mmareque@porib.com.
  • Granados R; Pathology Department. Hospital, Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
  • Andía D; Gynecology and Obstetrics. Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Spain.
  • García-Rojo M; Pathology Department, Hospital, Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.
  • Quílez JC; Gynecology and Obstetrics. Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Spain.
  • Oyagüez I; Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, Spain.
BMC Womens Health ; 21(1): 178, 2021 04 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33902553
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

HPV cervical cancer screening (CCS) must use validated HPV tests based on the molecular detection of either viral mRNA (Aptima HPV Assay-AHPV) or DNA. AHPV has demonstrated the same cross-sectional and longitudinal sensitivity for the detection of HSIL/CIN2+ lesions but with greater specificity than HPV-DNA tests. The study aimed to estimate the total costs of a CCS with a primary HPV test based on the detection of mRNA compared to DNA in women aged 35-65 years for the National Health System.

METHODS:

A decision-tree-based model to estimate the cost of the CCS until the first colposcopy was designed based on Spanish CCS guidelines. The total cost (€, 2019) for CCS with AHPV or DNA tests (HC2 and Cobas) was calculated, including HPV test, liquid-based cytology (LBC) and colposcopy, for a population of 7,263,529 women aged 35-65 years (assuming 70% coverage). Clinical inputs derived from a literature review were validated by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Data from head-to-head studies between different HPV tests were selected.

RESULTS:

The use of AHPV showed reduction of 290,541 (- 35%) and 355,913 (- 40%) LBC compared to HC2 or Cobas, respectively. Furthermore, AHPV avoided 151,699 (- 47%) colposcopies versus HC2 and 151,165 (- 47%) versus Cobas. The total cost of CCS was € 282,747,877 with AHPV, € 322,587,588 with HC2 and € 324,614,490 with Cobas. Therefore, AHPV savings € - 39,839,711 versus HC2 and € - 41,866,613 versus Cobas.

CONCLUSIONS:

Assuming that 70% of women from 35 to 65 years attend the CCS programme, the cost of screening up to the first colposcopy using AHPV would provide cost savings of up to € 41.9 million versus DNA tests in Spain.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Womens Health Assunto da revista: SAUDE DA MULHER Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Womens Health Assunto da revista: SAUDE DA MULHER Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha