Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Internal Medicine Residents' Perceptions of Virtual Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey.
Albert, Tyler J; Bradley, Joel; Starks, Helene; Redinger, Jeff; Arundel, Cherinne; Beard, Albertine; Caputo, Laura; Chun, Jonathan; Gunderson, Craig G; Heppe, Dan; Jagannath, Anand; Kent, Kyle; Krug, Michael; Laudate, James; Palaniappan, Vignesh; Pensiero, Amanda; Sargsyan, Zaven; Sladek, Emily; Tuck, Matthew; Cornia, Paul B.
Afiliação
  • Albert TJ; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA. Tyler.Albert@va.gov.
  • Bradley J; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. Tyler.Albert@va.gov.
  • Starks H; White River Junction VA Medical Center, Junction, White River, VT, USA.
  • Redinger J; Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
  • Arundel C; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Beard A; Dept of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Caputo L; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Chun J; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Gunderson CG; Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Heppe D; Department of Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Jagannath A; Department of Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Kent K; Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Krug M; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Laudate J; Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Palaniappan V; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Pensiero A; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
  • Sargsyan Z; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Sladek E; VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, CT, USA.
  • Tuck M; Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Cornia PB; VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(6): 1422-1428, 2022 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34173198
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted graduate medical education, compelling training programs to abruptly transition to virtual educational formats despite minimal experience or proficiency. We surveyed residents from a national sample of internal medicine (IM) residency programs to describe their experiences with the transition to virtual morning report (MR), a highly valued core educational conference.

OBJECTIVE:

Assess resident views about virtual MR content and teaching strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN:

Anonymous, web-based survey.

PARTICIPANTS:

Residents from 14 academically affiliated IM residency programs. MAIN

MEASURES:

The 25-item survey on virtual MR included questions on demographics; frequency and reason for attending; opinions on who should attend and teach; how the virtual format affects the learning environment; how virtual MR compares to in-person MR with regard to participation, engagement, and overall education; and whether virtual MR should continue after in-person conferences can safely resume. The survey included a combination of Likert-style, multiple option, and open-ended questions.

RESULTS:

Six hundred fifteen residents (35%) completed the survey, with a balanced sample of interns (39%), second-year (31%), and third-year (30%) residents. When comparing their overall assessment of in-person and virtual MR formats, 42% of residents preferred in-person, 18% preferred virtual, and 40% felt they were equivalent. Most respondents endorsed better peer-engagement, camaraderie, and group participation with in-person MR. Chat boxes, video participation, audience response systems, and smart boards/tablets enhanced respondents' educational experience during virtual MR. Most respondents (72%) felt that the option of virtual MR should continue when it is safe to resume in-person conferences.

CONCLUSIONS:

Virtual MR was a valued alternative to traditional in-person MR during the COVID-19 pandemic. Residents feel that the virtual platform offers unique educational benefits independent of and in conjunction with in-person conferences. Residents support the integration of a virtual platform into the delivery of MR in the future.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Visitas de Preceptoria / COVID-19 / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Visitas de Preceptoria / COVID-19 / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos