Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Coaching to enhance qualified surgeons' non-technical skills: a systematic review.
Granchi, N; Ting, Y Y; Foley, K P; Reid, J L; Vreugdenburg, T D; Trochsler, M I; Bruening, M H; Maddern, G J.
Afiliação
  • Granchi N; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Ting YY; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Foley KP; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Reid JL; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Vreugdenburg TD; Research and Evaluation Incorporating ASERNIP-S, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Trochsler MI; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Bruening MH; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Maddern GJ; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Br J Surg ; 108(10): 1154-1161, 2021 10 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34476480
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The lack of an effective continuing professional development programme for qualified surgeons, specifically one that enhances non-technical skills (NTS), is an issue receiving increased attention. Peer-based coaching, used in multiple professions, is a proposed method to deliver this. The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review of the literature to summarize the quantity and quality of studies involving surgical coaching of NTS in qualified surgeons.

METHODS:

A systematic search of the literature was performed through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Collaboration and PsychINFO. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data for the included studies was independently extracted by two reviewers and the quality of the studies evaluated using the Medical Education and Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI).

RESULTS:

Some 4319 articles were screened from which 19 met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies involved coaching of individual surgeons and nine looked at group coaching of surgeons as part of a team. Group coaching studies used non-surgeons as coaches, included objective assessment of NTS, and were of a higher quality (average MERSQI 13.58). Individual coaching studies focused on learner perception, used experienced surgeons as coaches and were of a lower quality (average MERSQI 11.58). Individual coaching did not show an objective improvement in NTS for qualified surgeons in any study.

CONCLUSION:

Surgical coaching of qualified surgeons' NTS in a group setting was found to be effective. Coaching of individual surgeons revealed an overall positive learner perception but did not show an objective improvement in NTS for qualified surgeons.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Grupo Associado / Competência Clínica / Cirurgiões / Tutoria Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Surg Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Grupo Associado / Competência Clínica / Cirurgiões / Tutoria Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Surg Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália