Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study.
Yamanouchi, Liana; Srinivasan, Maheshwari; Barlow, Nicola; Basu, Ansu.
Afiliação
  • Yamanouchi L; Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Lipid Metabolism, Birmingham City Hospital, Birmingham, UK l.yamanouchi@nhs.net.
  • Srinivasan M; East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
  • Barlow N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
  • Basu A; Deparment of Clinical Chemistry, Black Country Pathology Services, Sandwell General Hospital, West Bromwich, Birmingham, UK.
BMJ Open ; 11(9): e048705, 2021 09 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34526340
OBJECTIVES: A third of pregnant women in the UK are vitamin D deficient, which may confer deleterious consequences, including an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus and intrauterine growth restriction. This study aims to determine the proportion of women that met National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) standards for vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and compare biochemical and obstetrical outcomes according to supplementation status. DESIGN AND SETTING: This is a single-centre cross-sectional study in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK. Participants received a questionnaire regarding their experiences with vitamin D supplementation during their pregnancy with their general practitioner. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and bone profile results were obtained during the same appointment and obstetrical outcomes were collected retrospectively once participants had delivered. RESULTS: 41.8% of participants (n=61) received written and/or verbal advice about supplementation, (NICE standards=100%). 72.6% (n=106) had one or more risk factors for vitamin D deficiency, of which 38.7% (n=41, NICE standards=100%) were asked about supplementation. Among those asked, 85.4% (n=41, NICE standards=100%) received the correct dosage. Compared with the supplementation group, the non-supplementation group had offspring that were 1.40 cm (95% CI 0.01 to 2.80, p=0.04) longer at birth; which was significant after adjusting for confounding factors. No significant differences in any biochemical parameters were observed between supplementation categories (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to NICE standards was suboptimal. This may be attributed to insufficient training for general practitioners on the importance of supplementation, causing them to underestimate the consequences of gestational vitamin D deficiency. Recommendations include implementing a mandatory screening tool to identify 'at-risk' women and providing more clinician training to ensure that supplementation during pregnancy is standard of care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações na Gravidez / Deficiência de Vitamina D Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações na Gravidez / Deficiência de Vitamina D Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article