Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cue utilisation reduces the impact of response bias in histopathology.
Carrigan, A J; Charlton, A; Wiggins, M W; Georgiou, A; Palmeri, T; Curby, K M.
Afiliação
  • Carrigan AJ; Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Elite Performance, Expertise & Training, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: ann.carrigan@mq.edu.au.
  • Charlton A; Department of Histopathology, Auckland City Hospital, and Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Wiggins MW; Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Elite Performance, Expertise & Training, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
  • Georgiou A; Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
  • Palmeri T; Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States.
  • Curby KM; Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Elite Performance, Expertise & Training, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Appl Ergon ; 98: 103590, 2022 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34598079
ABSTRACT
Histopathologists make diagnostic decisions that are thought to be based on pattern recognition, likely informed by cue-based associations formed in memory, a process known as cue utilisation. Typically, the cases presented to the histopathologist have already been classified as 'abnormal' by clinical examination and/or other diagnostic tests. This results in a high disease prevalence, the potential for 'abnormality priming', and a response bias leading to false positives on normal cases. This study investigated whether higher cue utilisation is associated with a reduction in positive response bias in the diagnostic decisions of histopathologists. Data were collected from eighty-two histopathologists who completed a series of demographic and experience-related questions and the histopathology edition of the Expert Intensive Skills Evaluation 2.0 (EXPERTise 2.0) to establish behavioural indicators of context-related cue utilisation. They also completed a separate, diagnostic task comprising breast histopathology images where the frequency of abnormality was manipulated to create a high disease prevalence context for diagnostic decisions relating to normal tissue. Participants were assigned to higher or lower cue utilisation groups based on their performance on EXPERTise 2.0. When the effects of experience were controlled, higher cue utilisation was specifically associated with a greater accuracy classifying normal images, recording a lower positive response bias. This study suggests that cue utilisation may play a protective role against response biases in histopathology settings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sinais (Psicologia) Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Appl Ergon Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sinais (Psicologia) Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Appl Ergon Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article