Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk Prediction in Cardiogenic Shock: Current State of Knowledge, Challenges and Opportunities.
Kalra, Sanjog; Ranard, Lauren S; Memon, Sehrish; Rao, Prashant; Garan, A Reshad; Masoumi, Amirali; O'Neill, William; Kapur, Navin K; Karmpaliotis, Dimitri; Fried, Justin A; Burkhoff, Daniel.
Afiliação
  • Kalra S; The Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: sanjog.kalra@uhn.ca.
  • Ranard LS; Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
  • Memon S; Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Rao P; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Masschusetts.
  • Garan AR; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Masschusetts.
  • Masoumi A; Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
  • O'Neill W; Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Kapur NK; Tufts University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Karmpaliotis D; Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.
  • Fried JA; Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
  • Burkhoff D; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.
J Card Fail ; 27(10): 1099-1110, 2021 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34625129
ABSTRACT
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a condition associated with high mortality rates in which prognostication is uncertain for a variety of reasons, including its myriad causes, its rapidly evolving clinical course and the plethora of established and emerging therapies for the condition. A number of validated risk scores are available for CS prognostication; however, many of these are tedious to use, are designed for application in a variety of populations and fail to incorporate contemporary hemodynamic parameters and contemporary mechanical circulatory support interventions that can affect outcomes. It is important to separate patients with CS who may recover with conservative pharmacological therapies from those in who may require advanced therapies to survive; it is equally important to identify quickly those who will succumb despite any therapy. An ideal risk-prediction model would balance incorporation of key hemodynamic parameters while still allowing dynamic use in multiple scenarios, from aiding with early decision making to device weaning. Herein, we discuss currently available CS risk scores, perform a detailed analysis of the variables in each of these scores that are most predictive of CS outcomes and explore a framework for the development of novel risk scores that consider emerging therapies and paradigms for this challenging clinical entity.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque Cardiogênico / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Card Fail Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque Cardiogênico / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Card Fail Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article