Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of physical enhancement technologies in the skin permeation of methyl amino levulinic acid (mALA).
Jhanker, Yeakuty; Mbano, Melinda N; Ponto, Thellie; Espartero, Lore Jane L; Yamada, Miko; Prow, Tarl; Benson, Heather A E.
Afiliação
  • Jhanker Y; Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Mbano MN; Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Ponto T; Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Espartero LJL; Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Yamada M; Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Prow T; Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Skin Research Centre, York Biomedical Research Institute, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
  • Benson HAE; Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. Electronic address: H.Benson@curtin.edu.au.
Int J Pharm ; 610: 121258, 2021 Dec 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34740760
ABSTRACT
Physical drug delivery enhancement in skin has been shown to enhance cosmeceutical actives efficacy. Among the physical drug delivery enhancement technologies, microneedle is the most commercially successful technology. However, there are pros and cons like other physical enhancement technologies including variabilities in penetration depth and lack of efficacy. In this study, three physical topical dug delivery enhancements, elongated microparticles, microneedles and dermaroller, were applied to ex vivo pig skin and compared. The model topical drug that was used is 5-Aminolevulinic acid, the most commonly used photosensitiser prodrug. The skin was pre-treated before mounting on to Franz cell diffusion apparatus. Transdermal epidermal water loss was measured, and receptor fluids were collected at 7 time points for HPLC analysis. The results show that all three technologies disrupted the skin surface. All microporation pre-treatments significantly enhanced mALA cumulative permeation over 8 h (p < 0.001), with the 24x dermaroller significantly greater than 12x dermaroller (p < 0.001) and both dermaroller treatments significantly greater than microneedles and elongated microparticles (p < 0.05). The microporation pre-treatments all significantly increased mALA deposition in the stratum corneum and deeper skin tissues compared to passive administration, with deposition increases ranging from 3.6x to 15.1x that of passive administration. The DR pretreatment showed highest enhancement ratios (amount 5-Aminolevulinic acid in skin at 8 h following pretreatment v passive) with the following order of enhancement 24x dermaroller > 12x dermaroller > microneedles > elongated microparticles. In conclusion, physical enhancement tools such as microneedles, dermarollers and elongated microparticles demonstrated significant penetration and retention of mALA through/into piglet skin. Further study is needed to determine the cost, dose and patient compliance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Melhoramento Biomédico / Ácido Aminolevulínico Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Int J Pharm Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Melhoramento Biomédico / Ácido Aminolevulínico Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Int J Pharm Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália