Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Benefit-Risk Assessment for Lidocaine 700 mg Medicated Plaster and Pregabalin in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Following a Structured Framework Approach.
Sabatschus, Ingo; Bösl, Irmgard; Prevoo, Marlou; Eerdekens, Mariëlle; Sprünken, Arne; Galm, Oliver; Forstner, Michael.
Afiliação
  • Sabatschus I; Grünenthal GmbH, 52099, Aachen, Germany. ingo.sabatschus@grunenthal.com.
  • Bösl I; Grünenthal GmbH, 52099, Aachen, Germany.
  • Prevoo M; Grünenthal GmbH, 52099, Aachen, Germany.
  • Eerdekens M; Grünenthal GmbH, 52099, Aachen, Germany.
  • Sprünken A; Grünenthal GmbH, 52099, Aachen, Germany.
  • Galm O; Grünenthal GmbH, 52099, Aachen, Germany.
  • Forstner M; Mesama-Consulting, Bärschwil, Switzerland.
Pain Ther ; 11(1): 73-91, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34792789
INTRODUCTION: Peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) is difficult to treat. Several oral drugs are recommended as first-line treatments. Nevertheless, many patients cannot obtain sufficient pain relief or do not tolerate systemically active treatments. Topical treatments, with a lower risk of systemic side effects such as lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster, are also recommended in treatment guidelines. This analysis compares the benefit-risk balance of topical 700 mg lidocaine medicated plaster with the benefit-risk balance of oral pregabalin administration for the treatment of PNP following current recommendations on benefit-risk assessment (BRA) methodology. METHODS: The Benefit-Risk Action Team (BRAT) framework was used as structured approach. Selection of key benefits and risks was supported by a patient survey. Published randomized controlled clinical trials were the main source to identify data related to key benefits and risks. The outcome of randomized clinical trials was compared with real-world evidence (RWE) data for consistency. RESULTS: Identified key benefits were pain reduction and improvement in quality of life. Key risks identified were application site reactions, dizziness, confusion, weight gain, peripheral edema, and blurred vision. Overall, there was similarity in key benefits between the comparators; however, a clear advantage regarding key risks in favor of lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster was observed. This observation was consistent across data from a direct comparison trial, randomized placebo-controlled trials, as well as data from RWE studies. The low number of randomized controlled trials for lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster was the main limitation. CONCLUSION: Guided by the opinion of patients regarding key benefits and risks deemed important for treatments of peripheral neuropathic pain, our analysis showed that lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster has a more favorable benefit-risk balance compared to pregabalin (300 and 600 mg daily).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pain Ther Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pain Ther Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha