Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The influence of age on prostate cancer screening index.
Shan, Jiahao; Liu, Ziyang; Geng, Xinyu; Feng, Yuelong; Yang, Xiaobo; Xu, Haoran; Zhou, Xiaojie; Ma, Wenzhuo; Zhu, Hengyu; Shi, Hongbin.
Afiliação
  • Shan J; Department of Urology, Suzhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Suzhou, China.
  • Liu Z; School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
  • Geng X; Department of Urology, Suzhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Suzhou, China.
  • Feng Y; Department of Urology, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, China.
  • Yang X; Department of urology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
  • Xu H; School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
  • Zhou X; School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
  • Ma W; School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
  • Zhu H; School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
  • Shi H; Department of urology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 36(1): e24098, 2022 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34816496
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to identify parameters with a higher diagnostic value for early screening of prostate cancer (PCa) at different ages. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A total of 294 patients were included and divided into two groups according to the age of patients (≤66 and >66 years). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA), free PSA (FPSA), (F/T)PSA, PSA density (PSAD), PSA-AV score, the ratio of patients' age to prostate volume (AVR) and (F/T)/PSAD were constructed. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated, and differences in the AUC values among the above-mentioned parameters were compared.

RESULTS:

There were 121 patients in the ≤66 years age group (benign prostatic hyperplasia BPH, 103 patients; PCa 18 patients) and 173 patients in the >66 years age group (BPH, 100 patients; PCa, 73 patients). In the ≤66 years age group, the AUC value of AVR for PCa diagnosis was the highest; however, there was no statistically significant difference compared with the AUC values of PSAD and (F/T)/PSAD; compared with TPSA, FPSA, (F/T)PSA and PSA-AV, the differences were statistically significant. In the >66 years age group, the AUC values of PSAD and PSA-AV for PCa diagnosis were higher than those of TPSA, FPSA, (F/T)PSA and (F/T)/PSAD, and the difference was statistically significant; however, the difference was not statistically significant when compared with the AUC value of AVR.

CONCLUSION:

In different age groups, screening indices for PCa diagnosis should be selected according to the age of patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Fatores Etários Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Lab Anal Assunto da revista: TECNICAS E PROCEDIMENTOS DE LABORATORIO Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Fatores Etários Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Lab Anal Assunto da revista: TECNICAS E PROCEDIMENTOS DE LABORATORIO Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China