Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Personal recovery and its challenges in forensic mental health: systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature.
Senneseth, Mette; Pollak, Charlotte; Urheim, Ragnar; Logan, Caroline; Palmstierna, Tom.
Afiliação
  • Senneseth M; Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway; and Department of Welfare and Participation, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway.
  • Pollak C; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; and Stockholm Forensic Psychiatric Clinic, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Urheim R; Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway.
  • Logan C; Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway; and Edenfield Centre, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich Hospital, UK.
  • Palmstierna T; Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; and Stockholm Forensic Psychiatric Clinic, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
BJPsych Open ; 8(1): e17, 2021 Dec 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34915963
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There has been a call for a framework to guide recovery-oriented practices in forensic mental health services.

AIMS:

This study aims to examine personal recovery and its challenges in forensic mental health settings in relation to the established framework for personal recovery in mental illness connectedness, hope, identity, meaning and empowerment (CHIME).

METHOD:

This study is an updated and expanded systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature. A systematic search of six electronic databases (Web of Science, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and SocIndex) was carried out in January 2019, using the terms [Recover*] AND [Forensic OR Secure] AND [Patient* OR Offend* OR Service User*]. Only studies that included service user's own perceptions and were published from 2014 onward were included in the review. Data were examined with thematic synthesis and subsequently analysed in relation to the CHIME framework.

RESULTS:

Twenty-one studies were included in the review. Findings suggest that some adjustments to the original CHIME framework are needed for it to be more relevant to forensic populations, and that an additional recovery process regarding feeling safe and being secure (safety and security) could be added to CHIME, providing the CHIME-Secure framework (CHIME-S). Specific challenges and barriers for forensic recovery were identified and found to represent the opposite of the recovery processes defined by CHIME (e.g. hopelessness).

CONCLUSIONS:

We present the CHIME-S as a framework for the personal recovery processes of forensic mental health service users. The CHIME-S may guide the recovery-oriented work of forensic mental health services.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: BJPsych Open Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: BJPsych Open Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Noruega