Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of stimulation time on the expression of human macrophage polarization markers.
Unuvar Purcu, Duygu; Korkmaz, Asli; Gunalp, Sinem; Helvaci, Derya Goksu; Erdal, Yonca; Dogan, Yavuz; Suner, Asli; Wingender, Gerhard; Sag, Duygu.
Afiliação
  • Unuvar Purcu D; Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Korkmaz A; Department of Molecular Medicine, Health Sciences Institute, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Gunalp S; Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Helvaci DG; Department of Genomic Sciences and Molecular Biotechnology, Izmir International Biomedicine and Genome Institute, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Erdal Y; Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Dogan Y; Department of Genomic Sciences and Molecular Biotechnology, Izmir International Biomedicine and Genome Institute, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Suner A; Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Wingender G; Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Sag D; Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
PLoS One ; 17(3): e0265196, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35286356
ABSTRACT
Macrophages are highly plastic cells that can polarize into functionally distinct subsets in vivo and in vitro in response to environmental signals. The development of protocols to model macrophage polarization in vitro greatly contributes to our understanding of macrophage biology. Macrophages are divided into two main groups Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages (classically activated) and anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages (alternatively activated), based on several key surface markers and the production of inflammatory mediators. However, the expression of these common macrophage polarization markers is greatly affected by the stimulation time used. Unfortunately, there is no consensus yet regarding the optimal stimulation times for particular macrophage polarization markers in in vitro experiments. This situation is problematic, (i) as analysing a particular marker at a suboptimal time point can lead to false-negative results, and (ii) as it clearly impedes the comparison of different studies. Using human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) in vitro, we analysed how the expression of the main polarization markers for M1 (CD64, CD86, CXCL9, CXCL10, HLA-DR, IDO1, IL1ß, IL12, TNF), M2a (CD200R, CD206, CCL17, CCL22, IL-10, TGM2), and M2c (CD163, IL-10, TGFß) macrophages changes over time at mRNA and protein levels. Our data establish the most appropriate stimulation time for the analysis of the expression of human macrophage polarization markers in vitro. Providing such a reference guide will likely facilitate the investigation of macrophage polarization and its reproducibility.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Interleucina-10 / Ativação de Macrófagos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Interleucina-10 / Ativação de Macrófagos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia