Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Educative Impact of Automatic Delineation Applied to Head and Neck Cancer Patients on Radiation Oncology Residents.
Sarrade, Thomas; Gautier, Michael; Schernberg, Antoine; Jenny, Catherine; Orthuon, Alexandre; Maingon, Philippe; Huguet, Florence.
Afiliação
  • Sarrade T; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France.
  • Gautier M; Department of Medical Physics, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
  • Schernberg A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France.
  • Jenny C; Department of Medical Physics, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
  • Orthuon A; Department of Medical Physics, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
  • Maingon P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
  • Huguet F; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
J Cancer Educ ; 38(2): 578-589, 2023 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35359258
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the educational impact on radiation oncology residents in training when introducing an automatic segmentation software in head and neck cancer patients regarding organs at risk (OARs) and prophylactic cervical lymph node level (LNL) volumes. Two cases treated by exclusive intensity-modulated radiotherapy were delineated by an expert radiation oncologist and were considered as reference. Then, these cases were delineated by residents divided into two groups group 1 (control group), experienced residents delineating manually, group 2 (experimental group), young residents on their first rotation trained with automatic delineation, delineating manually first (M -) and then after using the automatic system (M +). The delineation accuracy was assessed using the Overlap Volume (OV). Regarding the OARs, mean OV was 0.62 (SD = 0.05) for group 1, 0.56 (SD = 0.04) for group 2 M - , and 0.61 (SD = 0.03) for group 2 M + . Mean OV was higher in group 1 compared to group 2 M - (p = 0.01). There was no OV difference between group 1 and group 2 M + (p = 0.67). Mean OV was higher in the group 2 M + compared to group 2 M - (p < 0.003). Regarding LNL, mean OV was 0.53 (SD = 0.06) in group 1, 0.54 (SD = 0.03) in group 2 M - , and 0.58 (SD = 0.04) in group 2 M + . Mean OV was higher in group 2 M + for 11 of the 12 analysed structures compared to group 2 M - (p = 0.016). Prior use of the automatic delineation software reduced the average contouring time per case by 34 to 40%. Prior use of atlas-based automatic segmentation reduces the delineation duration, and provides reliable OARs and LNL delineations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia (Especialidade) / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia (Especialidade) / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França