Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of concomitant popliteal vein thrombosis in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis treated with endovascular early thrombus removal.
Frey, Vincent; Sebastian, Tim; Barco, Stefano; Spirk, David; Hayoz, Daniel; Périard, Daniel; Kucher, Nils; Betticher, Daniel; Engelberger, Rolf P.
Afiliação
  • Frey V; Department of Internal Medicine, HFR Fribourg - Cantonal Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland.
  • Sebastian T; Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Barco S; Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Spirk D; Institute of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Switzerland.
  • Hayoz D; Department of Internal Medicine, HFR Fribourg - Cantonal Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland.
  • Périard D; Division of Angiology, HFR Fribourg - Cantonal Hospital, Switzerland.
  • Kucher N; Department of Internal Medicine, HFR Fribourg - Cantonal Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland.
  • Betticher D; Division of Angiology, HFR Fribourg - Cantonal Hospital, Switzerland.
  • Engelberger RP; Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
Vasa ; 51(5): 282-290, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35774017
Background: Catheter-based thrombus removal (CBTR) reduces the risk of moderate to severe post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IF-DVT). However, the impact of concomitant popliteal DVT on clinical and duplex sonographic outcomes is unknown. Patients and methods: In this post-hoc analysis including the entire cohort of the randomized controlled BERNUTIFUL trial (48 patients), we compared clinical (incidence/severity of PTS assessed by Villalta score and revised venous clinical severity scores, rVCSS), disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL, CIVIQ-20 survey) and duplex sonographic outcomes (patency, reflux, post-thrombotic lesions) at 12 months follow-up between patients with IF-DVT with and without concomitant popliteal DVT treated by CBTR. Results: Overall, 48 IF-DVT patients were included (48% men, median age of 50 years), of whom 17 (35%) presented with popliteal DVT. At baseline, patients with popliteal DVT were older, had a higher body mass index and more important leg swelling. At 12 months, freedom from PTS (93% vs 87%, P=0.17), median total Villalta score (1 vs 1.5; P=0.46), rVCSS (2 vs 1.5, P=0.5) and disease-specific QOL (24 points vs 24 points, P=0.72) were similar between patient with and without popliteal DVT, respectively. Duplex sonographic outcomes were similar, except for more frequent popliteal post-thrombotic lesions and reflux (P=0.02) in patients with popliteal DVT. Conclusions: Relevant clinical outcomes 1 year after successful CBTR were favorable, regardless of the presence or absence of concomitant popliteal DVT. However, post-thrombotic popliteal vein lesions and reflux are more frequent in IF-DVT patients with popliteal involvement. Their impact on long-term outcomes remains to be investigated.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Trombose Venosa / Síndrome Pós-Trombótica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Vasa Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Trombose Venosa / Síndrome Pós-Trombótica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Vasa Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça