Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Global application of an unoccupied aerial vehicle photogrammetry protocol for predicting aboveground biomass in non-forest ecosystems.
Cunliffe, Andrew M; Anderson, Karen; Boschetti, Fabio; Brazier, Richard E; Graham, Hugh A; Myers-Smith, Isla H; Astor, Thomas; Boer, Matthias M; Calvo, Leonor G; Clark, Patrick E; Cramer, Michael D; Encinas-Lara, Miguel S; Escarzaga, Stephen M; Fernández-Guisuraga, José M; Fisher, Adrian G; Gdulová, Katerina; Gillespie, Breahna M; Griebel, Anne; Hanan, Niall P; Hanggito, Muhammad S; Haselberger, Stefan; Havrilla, Caroline A; Heilman, Phil; Ji, Wenjie; Karl, Jason W; Kirchhoff, Mario; Kraushaar, Sabine; Lyons, Mitchell B; Marzolff, Irene; Mauritz, Marguerite E; McIntire, Cameron D; Metzen, Daniel; Méndez-Barroso, Luis A; Power, Simon C; Prosek, Jirí; Sanz-Ablanedo, Enoc; Sauer, Katherine J; Schulze-Brüninghoff, Damian; Símová, Petra; Sitch, Stephen; Smit, Julian L; Steele, Caiti M; Suárez-Seoane, Susana; Vargas, Sergio A; Villarreal, Miguel; Visser, Fleur; Wachendorf, Michael; Wirnsberger, Hannes; Wojcikiewicz, Robert.
Afiliação
  • Cunliffe AM; Department of Geography College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.
  • Anderson K; Environment and Sustainability Institute University of Exeter Penryn UK.
  • Boschetti F; Department of Geography College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.
  • Brazier RE; Department of Geography College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.
  • Graham HA; Department of Geography College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.
  • Myers-Smith IH; School of GeoSciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.
  • Astor T; Grassland Science and Renewable Plant Resources Organic Agricultural Sciences Universität Kassel Witzenhausen D-37213 Germany.
  • Boer MM; Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia.
  • Calvo LG; Biodiversity and Environmental Management Department Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of León León Spain.
  • Clark PE; Northwest Watershed Research Center USDA Agricultural Research Service Boise Idaho USA.
  • Cramer MD; Department of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.
  • Encinas-Lara MS; Department of Environmental and Water Sciences Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora Ciudad Obregón Sonora Mexico.
  • Escarzaga SM; Department of Biological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso El Paso Texas USA.
  • Fernández-Guisuraga JM; Biodiversity and Environmental Management Department Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of León León Spain.
  • Fisher AG; Joint Remote Sensing Research Program School of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland 4072 Australia.
  • Gdulová K; Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha - Suchdol 165 00 Czechia.
  • Gillespie BM; Biology Department San Diego State University San Diego California USA.
  • Griebel A; Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia.
  • Hanan NP; New Mexico State University Las Cruces New Mexico USA.
  • Hanggito MS; Department of Biological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso El Paso Texas USA.
  • Haselberger S; Department of Geography and Regional Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
  • Havrilla CA; Department of Biological Sciences Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona USA.
  • Heilman P; Southwest Watershed Research Center USDA-Agricultural Research Service Tucson Arizona USA.
  • Ji W; New Mexico State University Las Cruces New Mexico USA.
  • Karl JW; Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences University of Idaho Moscow Idaho USA.
  • Kirchhoff M; Department of Physical Geography Trier University Trier Germany.
  • Kraushaar S; Department of Geography and Regional Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
  • Lyons MB; School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of New South Wales Penrith New South Wales Australia.
  • Marzolff I; Department of Physical Geography Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Frankfurt am Main Germany.
  • Mauritz ME; Department of Biological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso El Paso Texas USA.
  • McIntire CD; University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico USA.
  • Metzen D; Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia.
  • Méndez-Barroso LA; Department of Environmental and Water Sciences Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora Ciudad Obregón Sonora Mexico.
  • Power SC; Department of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.
  • Prosek J; Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha - Suchdol 165 00 Czechia.
  • Sanz-Ablanedo E; Grupo de Investigación en Geomática e Ingeniería Cartográfica (GEOINCA) University of León Ponferrada Spain.
  • Sauer KJ; Department of Natural Resources Sul Ross State University Alpine Texas USA.
  • Schulze-Brüninghoff D; Grassland Science and Renewable Plant Resources Organic Agricultural Sciences Universität Kassel Witzenhausen D-37213 Germany.
  • Símová P; Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha - Suchdol 165 00 Czechia.
  • Sitch S; Department of Geography College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.
  • Smit JL; Geomatics Division School of Architecture, Planning and Geomatics University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.
  • Steele CM; New Mexico State University Las Cruces New Mexico USA.
  • Suárez-Seoane S; Department of Organisms and Systems Biology (Ecology Unit) and Research Unit of Biodiversity (UO-CSIC-PA) University of Oviedo Oviedo Mieres Spain.
  • Vargas SA; Department of Biological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso El Paso Texas USA.
  • Villarreal M; U.S. Geological Survey Western Geographic Science Center Moffett Field California USA.
  • Visser F; School of Science and the Environment University of Worcester Worcester UK.
  • Wachendorf M; Grassland Science and Renewable Plant Resources Organic Agricultural Sciences Universität Kassel Witzenhausen D-37213 Germany.
  • Wirnsberger H; Department of Geography and Regional Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
  • Wojcikiewicz R; New Mexico State University Las Cruces New Mexico USA.
Remote Sens Ecol Conserv ; 8(1): 57-71, 2022 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35873085
ABSTRACT
Non-forest ecosystems, dominated by shrubs, grasses and herbaceous plants, provide ecosystem services including carbon sequestration and forage for grazing, and are highly sensitive to climatic changes. Yet these ecosystems are poorly represented in remotely sensed biomass products and are undersampled by in situ monitoring. Current global change threats emphasize the need for new tools to capture biomass change in non-forest ecosystems at appropriate scales. Here we developed and deployed a new protocol for photogrammetric height using unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) images to test its capability for delivering standardized measurements of biomass across a globally distributed field experiment. We assessed whether canopy height inferred from UAV photogrammetry allows the prediction of aboveground biomass (AGB) across low-stature plant species by conducting 38 photogrammetric surveys over 741 harvested plots to sample 50 species. We found mean canopy height was strongly predictive of AGB across species, with a median adjusted R 2 of 0.87 (ranging from 0.46 to 0.99) and median prediction error from leave-one-out cross-validation of 3.9%. Biomass per-unit-of-height was similar within but different among, plant functional types. We found that photogrammetric reconstructions of canopy height were sensitive to wind speed but not sun elevation during surveys. We demonstrated that our photogrammetric approach produced generalizable measurements across growth forms and environmental settings and yielded accuracies as good as those obtained from in situ approaches. We demonstrate that using a standardized approach for UAV photogrammetry can deliver accurate AGB estimates across a wide range of dynamic and heterogeneous ecosystems. Many academic and land management institutions have the technical capacity to deploy these approaches over extents of 1-10 ha-1. Photogrammetric approaches could provide much-needed information required to calibrate and validate the vegetation models and satellite-derived biomass products that are essential to understand vulnerable and understudied non-forested ecosystems around the globe.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Remote Sens Ecol Conserv Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Remote Sens Ecol Conserv Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article